PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I actually think he’s neither. Arsenal were our biggest challengers when the main 115 news came out and so Nick made his other self an Arsenal fan.
If the 115 news had come out a few years earlier, Nick would’ve made his alter ego a Liverpool fan.

He basically just chose whomever was our biggest challengers at the time in order to camouflage his frankly weird and obsessive hatred of City and our owners.
Well he’s doing a good job at being a gooner
 
CFG shoulders all the group debt so I'm not sure we have much of a case on that.
My point was more about United. For any trading unit that is one of a number of subsidiaries there may well be a degree of merit in passing on certain costs to the parent company. It is less obvious what the justification is when the trading unit and the parent are essentially the same trading unit.
 
Not sure Ludwig really gave proper Rene credit, you should perhaps read her on the subject of his critique.
Which 'her' Anscombe? Not read anything beyond 'modern moral' which didn't really impress me. Regards Descartes its pretty clear what Wittgenstein opinion on his philosophy (regards scepticism) is, its pretty much the basis of PI.
 
i'm feeling audacious enough today to piss off the stay-on-thread moaners by starting a whole new line of chatter for no other reason than to compound their despair...


anyone fancy a chat about eggs?
i fuckin love them.
quite possibly the most versatile ingredient for a quick snack, buffet, sarnie or picnic.
 
Which 'her' Anscombe? Not read anything beyond 'modern moral' which didn't really impress me. Regards Descartes its pretty clear what Wittgenstein opinion on his philosophy (regards scepticism) is, its pretty much the basis of PI.
Yes, only one female mentioned in your post. His most prominent contemporary disciple and acknowledged as perhaps the most reliable interpreter. A formidable mind explored in this Radio 4 programme if you'd like to find out more about the relationship.
 
PB What do you think of MUFC submitting Red Football accounts as the basis of their PSR reporting. If PSR forms the basis of all PL clubs allowable spending, it seems that there should be uniform treatment of financial reporting It seems like a ruse to me if Utd's PSR calculation is based on a set of accounts that exclude legal costs and much of their debt finance costs. Shouldn't rival clubs complain as it enables an advantage to Man Utd in the transfer market?
They have to submit those accounts as they're the overarching legal entity registered in the UK, so it's not a "ruse" as such. But, as you say, we don't know what they exclude. I've always maintained there is more debt hidden in the Cayman Islands entities.

But as Stefan has pointed out, we pay Soriano and others from CFG (although I suspect we charge part of that back).
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top