Citizen of Legoland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 11,947
That wasn’t what I said.The club doesn't have to prove that there were no "off book arrangements". It is the PL that has to prove there were.
That wasn’t what I said.The club doesn't have to prove that there were no "off book arrangements". It is the PL that has to prove there were.
This is why jordan is an idiot, his big words give the illusion that he has some insight into things but in reality he is just the one eyed man in the land of blind on talksport bar @slbsn , our irrefutable proof was our accounts over the last years which have been audited and approved, the pl were asking us to prove a negative which is impossible and they know that, we gave our accounts in good faith with the approval that they were correct and above board and that is our irrefutable proof, the pl accused them of not being, therefore it is the pls accusation that they have to prove not the other way around and if the robbie savage clone had any idea of what he was talking about he would know that, alas he is a moron and the nonsense goes on.Yes which is exactly my point. This irrefutable evidence, based on what we said in our first press release, that Jordan seems to think we have that could have stopped all these shenanigans was the reason for my initial comment. People are thinking we have something like that but I always took it to mean the club are just confident they can demonstrate that the accusations did not occur ONCE legal proceedings commenced. You’re just not going to give your accuser further information until they’ve given you all their accusations and THEIR evidence.
Big words and big sentences.This is why jordan is an idiot, his big words give the illusion that he has some insight into things but in reality he is just the one eyed man in the land of blind on talksport bar @slbsn , our irrefutable proof was our accounts over the last years which have been audited and approved, the pl were asking us to prove a negative which is impossible and they know that, we gave our accounts in good faith with the approval that they were correct and above board and that is our irrefutable proof, the pl accused them of not being, therefore it is the pls accusation that they have to prove not the other way around and if the robbie savage clone had any idea of what he was talking about he would know that, alas he is a moron and the nonsense goes on.
I admit my use of grammar is poor but i will not be accused of using big words lolBig words and big sentences.
OK then- spell fynanshl.I admit my use of grammar is poor but i will not be accused of using big words lol
fynanshul obviouslyOK then- spell fynanshl.
Yeah the ‘but what about City?’ lot are lapping up the Lyon stuff.See the MUEN couldn't wait to link us with the Lyon farce.
Which is the same thing is it not.City don't have to prove it didn't occur, the PL have to prove it DID occur
noWhich is the same thing is it not.
absolutely not the same thing. the burden of proof does not lie with us.Which is the same thing is it not.
Correct, although the PL seem to think that it does with their catch-all rules.absolutely not the same thing. the burden of proof does not lie with us.
But the Lyon situation is EXACTLY the situation United are in. La Ligue fear that Lyon’s debt is so high that they may fail as an entity and so affect the credibility of the first division.Yeah the ‘but what about City?’ lot are lapping up the Lyon stuff.
shush you should know better than to let facts get in the way of the narrative of the fevered moronsBut the Lyon situation is EXACTLY the situation United are in. La Ligue fear that Lyon’s debt is so high that they may fail as an entity and so affect the credibility of the first division.
He's always implying (as do others) that it is city dragging the process out to delay some cataclysmic day of reckoning, whereas it is more likely to be the PL doing so.This is why jordan is an idiot, his big words give the illusion that he has some insight into things but in reality he is just the one eyed man in the land of blind on talksport bar @slbsn , our irrefutable proof was our accounts over the last years which have been audited and approved, the pl were asking us to prove a negative which is impossible and they know that, we gave our accounts in good faith with the approval that they were correct and above board and that is our irrefutable proof, the pl accused them of not being, therefore it is the pls accusation that they have to prove not the other way around and if the robbie savage clone had any idea of what he was talking about he would know that, alas he is a moron and the nonsense goes on.
Always remember....you cant beat a hard boiled egg!!!i'm feeling audacious enough today to piss off the stay-on-thread moaners by starting a whole new line of chatter for no other reason than to compound their despair...
anyone fancy a chat about eggs?
i fuckin love them.
quite possibly the most versatile ingredient for a quick snack, buffet, sarnie or picnic.