The Labour Government

meltonblue said:
There are plenty that think legal migration is an issue too, regardless of if they’re reform voters or not.
Click to expand...
Well I don't disagree, but in the argument you make you are probably talking about pure Racists.

But aside from pure racists (as described above) there are very many people (probably a majority) who welcome and support legal immigration but who are as equally firm against illegal immigration - and I am in that number.
 
BigJoe#1 said:
Well I don't disagree, but in the argument you make you are probably talking about pure Racists.

But aside from pure racists (as described above) there are very many people (probably a majority) who welcome and support legal immigration but who are as equally firm against illegal immigration - and I am in that number.
Click to expand...

No, wasn’t making an argument either way about their motivation for saying so. Just that you saying about legal vs illegal immigration and talking about reasons for voting for reform isn’t applicable to everyone.
 
meltonblue said:
There are plenty that think legal migration is an issue too, regardless of if they’re reform voters or not.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. It's simply too high. Sure it's dropped by circa half after the legislation introduced by the Tories before they left office.

But it's still too high at the moment. In future the current level of circa 400,000 per year may be perfectly manageable, but right now it isn't. Our public services and infrastructure - hospitals, roads, schools, housing etc - are all overloaded. Adding another 2m people over the next 5 years is madness.

This is nothing to do with racism, it's pure practicality.

The questions about social integration, (in)compatibility if Islam with British culture etc, do raise question marks (not proof, question marks) about whether such concerns are racist. But that's a separate issue altogether. We just cannot accommodate the numbers coming. It would be the same if it was 2m white Canadians arriving.
 
The Future’s Blue! said:
Then, I don’t understand what it means. Can’t be arsed trawling through google to find out how many kids a politician has.
Click to expand...

I was joking that if anyone knew how many kids starner had it would be you, twas only a joke.

The picture was of a small number of boys in Keirs sordid rent a boys club. Or a photoshop, or his kids, or his kids with a mate, or a boy band he has blagged tickets for, or non of the above:-)

As that you in the middle btw:-)
 
hilts said:
I was joking that if anyone knew how many kids starner had it would be you, twas only a joke.

The picture was of a small number of boys in Keirs sordid rent a boys club. Or a photoshop, or his kids, or his kids with a mate, or a boy band he has blagged tickets for, or non of the above:-)

As that you in the middle btw:-)
Click to expand...
You are very strange. Somebody asks a question and the first thing you do is have a go at the person, not the question or debate.

Have a nice weekend.
 
hampshireblue said:
I saw the story. What's the link to Starmer and 3 unidentified people?
Click to expand...
They aren't unidentified, they are the three alleged Rent Boys who are charged with damaging Starmer's property. Whose case suspiciously seems to have generated no interest in the media.
Do you get it now ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top