Cricket Thread

ancoats said:

Who will start the first Ashes Test in Perth?​

England do not play another Test before their Ashes opener on 21 November.

We asked the Test Match Special team who they would pick for that first match down under...
BBC chief cricket commentator Jonathan Agnew: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Carse, Archer, Wood.

Former England captain Michael Vaughan: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Archer, Wood, Carse/Tongue.

Ex-England batter Ebony Rainford-Brent: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Archer, Wood, Bashir.

Former England captain Sir Alastair Cook: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Wood, Archer, Carse, Atkinson.

Ex-England spinner Phil Tufnell: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Archer, Wood, Carse/Tongue.

BBC chief cricket reporter Stephan Shemilt: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Archer, Wood, Bashir.


I don't think the Aussies will win 5.0, but England need to keep the fast bowlers Archer Wood Atkinson fully fit and play at least 3 to 4 tests in a row, Also Smith the wicket keeper is a major doubt for me, Maybe England could recall one of the old guard Foakes or Bairstow, Plus Pope could take the gloves and we bring in somebody else at 3
Click to expand...

Depends on how they handle the pressure. We should have seen the chase through yesterday but couldn't get the job done and for all the hype around how well we chase big targets it also tells another story - that we are required to chase big targets!

We are going to have to bowl so much better than we have. If Wood can stay fit then Archer, Wood, Atkinson and probably Carse is a good seam attack. Or you drop one for a spinner/all rounder and Stokes bowls a lot as he has this summer.

The series hasn't really settled any of the big questions. We will see the same batting lineup but so much more is at stake in the Ashes. Brook can be forgiven a mighty heave and holing out against India, which started the collapse from a comfortable position, and after a great innings. The judgement will be harsher in Australia. And they'll happily set us up to swing at everything.

It should be a good series though. Their batting looks poor but that bowling attack is still so good.
 
supercity88 said:
Depends on how they handle the pressure. We should have seen the chase through yesterday but couldn't get the job done and for all the hype around how well we chase big targets it also tells another story - that we are required to chase big targets!

We are going to have to bowl so much better than we have. If Wood can stay fit then Archer, Wood, Atkinson and probably Carse is a good seam attack. Or you drop one for a spinner/all rounder and Stokes bowls a lot as he has this summer.

The series hasn't really settled any of the big questions. We will see the same batting lineup but so much more is at stake in the Ashes. Brook can be forgiven a mighty heave and holing out against India, which started the collapse from a comfortable position, and after a great innings. The judgement will be harsher in Australia. And they'll happily set us up to swing at everything.

It should be a good series though. Their batting looks poor but that bowling attack is still so good.
Click to expand...
We need Root to come good in Aus which he hasn’t done so far.
 
ancoats said:

Who will start the first Ashes Test in Perth?​

England do not play another Test before their Ashes opener on 21 November.

We asked the Test Match Special team who they would pick for that first match down under...
BBC chief cricket commentator Jonathan Agnew: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Carse, Archer, Wood.

Former England captain Michael Vaughan: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Archer, Wood, Carse/Tongue.

Ex-England batter Ebony Rainford-Brent: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Archer, Wood, Bashir.

Former England captain Sir Alastair Cook: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Wood, Archer, Carse, Atkinson.

Ex-England spinner Phil Tufnell: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Archer, Wood, Carse/Tongue.

BBC chief cricket reporter Stephan Shemilt: Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes, Smith, Atkinson, Archer, Wood, Bashir.


I don't think the Aussies will win 5.0, but England need to keep the fast bowlers Archer Wood Atkinson fully fit and play at least 3 to 4 tests in a row, Also Smith the wicket keeper is a major doubt for me, Maybe England could recall one of the old guard Foakes or Bairstow, Plus Pope could take the gloves and we bring in somebody else at 3
Click to expand...
For the first test, I think it will be:

1. Crawley
2. Duckett
3. Pope
4. Root
5. Brook
6. Stokes (C)
7. J Smith (WK)
8. Carse
9. Atkinson
10. Archer/Wood
11. Tongue/Bashir

Sadly, I don’t think we can risk playing Archer and Wood in the same side.
 
jimharri said:
I see the Hundred starts today. Wonderful. From that wonderful test series against India to this.

#fromthesublimetotheridiculous
Click to expand...

It's definitely going to be a hard act to follow.

Looking at the women's game I'm worried the pitch is an absolute road with nothing in it for the bowlers.

Also maybe not the best idea to host the so called London derby when half the London Spirit team will presumably be missing*

Jamie Smith, Ollie Pope, Liam Dawson and Jamie Overton.

I'll check and see what happens nonetheless.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
At least the graphics are better. You can actually see the scorecard properly now.
Click to expand...
Just had a very quick look. Seriously? I think it's horrific. Compare it to the test match scoreboard graphics. A simple banner in the top left corner showing the score and the amount of balls bowled. With the occasional narrow banner along the bottom of the screen showing the batsmen's scores and the bowler's stats. What they have is an assault on the senses!
 
First boundary is a beautiful cover drive for four from Kane Williamson.

Have they not read the script?
 
jimharri said:
Just had a very quick look. Seriously? I think it's horrific. Compare it to the test match scoreboard graphics. A simple banner in the top left corner showing the score and the amount of balls bowled. With the occasional narrow banner along the bottom of the screen showing the batsmen's scores and the bowler's stats. What they have is an assault on the senses!
Click to expand...
IMG_8040.jpeg

This was what it was like last time round! It’s better, but from an incredibly low bar.
 
Seems like the BBC have forgotten to employ a proper 'play by play' commentator?

I like the ones they have. But they're more to provide a bit of insight rather than keep the commentary going.
 
What the fuck is the point of the 100? I end up dividing the balls bowled by 6 to get it to old style overs, and then dividing the score by that derived numbers of owners, to get a perspective on how the batting team is doing
 
BringBackSwales said:
What the fuck is the point of the 100? I end up dividing the balls bowled by 6 to get it to old style overs, and then dividing the score by that derived numbers of owners, to get a perspective on how the batting team is doing
Click to expand...

No need for any calculations this match is done already.
 
Hope Warner now appreciates that if you adopt the Billy Big Bollox persona you need to be able to walk the walk.
 
Sam
BringBackSwales said:
What the fuck is the point of the 100? I end up dividing the balls bowled by 6 to get it to old style overs, and then dividing the score by that derived numbers of owners, to get a perspective on how the batting team is doing
Click to expand...
Same. Why couldn't they make it a number of balls divisible by 6 (96 or 102)?"Sets" of 5 is nonsense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top