You lost me at Wank Bissaka
Corrected for you. ;-)
You lost me at Wank Bissaka
I'm sorry mate but this is a really funny post.All I want is a goalkeeper who is a truly safe pair of hands between the sticks. I’m not interested with this obsession with building from the back with the Goalkeeper. What matters most is reliability and presence in goal. He never looked out of place in a PSG side renowned for their quick, attractive, and swashbuckling style of football. Some of his saves last season, particularly against Arsenal, Liverpool, and Aston Villa, were nothing short of extraordinary. It would be a welcome change to have a keeper capable of keeping us in a match through moments of brilliance, rather than one who concedes from the opposition’s very first shot on target.
I can't honestly believe there are posters who are against this. Him and Trafford as number 1 and 2 are the best options a club will have in the League.
Sure, but worlds apart from what you said earlier.We have to sign those better players because of the levels we’re competing at. Foden and Rico have shown there is a path into the first team if you are good enough and patient.
Players like Sancho and Palmer wanted more than promises of a path into the first team, they wanted assurances that they would play - which Pep won’t give.
Trafford shouldn’t even be at City. He’s nowhere near the standard to be a keeper for one of the best teams in the world. If Traffords our no1, the standards have really dropped.Top class keeper if not best around atm, if available you go for him
feel a bit sorry for Trafford if thus happens though as I think game time would lessen
Maybe the two of them are playing this out?True but Luis Enrique doesn’t think he fits into a style of play most similar to Pep’s Asauming the quote is true seem strange that Pep want him if true of course View attachment 165778
In fairness both signings (if DR happens) feel opportunist and reactive rather than 'planned' as such.I feel for Trafford, I really do.
But Donnarumma is arguably the best keeper on the planet and is 26. He could be our GK and be world class for a decade. Trafford was a guy who was supposed to sit on the bench and grow this year under Eddie. I think Galatasary came back to the table for Eddie, and we don't believe we can compete with Trafford as our starter, and this option presented itself and it was just too good of an opportunity to pass up.
This is a brutal industry, and it has happened to players before, even here. I think Trafford should take the cup games, play well and go get a move to a Chelsea, Newcastle, Spurs, or maybe even abroad if the right opportunity presents itself.
I guess you could say PSG is a good example of how you can end up with the best squad in the world through opportunism.In fairness both signings (if DR happens) feel opportunist and reactive rather than 'planned' as such.
Not saying that as a bad thing, just pointing out how it looks.
In his last year of contract, replaced, unwanted, already said goodbye.Just seen a rumour that PSG would expect €20-30m. Can't be arsed to go back and find the source but that price would make this a bit more palatable.
Still feel like this is a weird move though.
I disagree but each to their ownTrafford shouldn’t even be at City. He’s nowhere near the standard to be a keeper for one of the best teams in the world. If Traffords our no1, the standards have really dropped.
It's the transfer window.If Ederson is leaving, I agree we need someone more established/better than Trafford, but Donnarumma is only 26. If we're paying PSG for him, I imagine he'd be getting a 4-5 year deal, which makes zero sense to what we just paid for Trafford...
And where is Oretga in all this? Very odd.
Not sure Donnarumma is anywhere near Oblak, Garcia, Alison, Cortois or Chevelier.I feel for Trafford, I really do.
But Donnarumma is arguably the best keeper on the planet and is 26. He could be our GK and be world class for a decade. Trafford was a guy who was supposed to sit on the bench and grow this year under Eddie. I think Galatasary came back to the table for Eddie, and we don't believe we can compete with Trafford as our starter, and this option presented itself and it was just too good of an opportunity to pass up.
This is a brutal industry, and it has happened to players before, even here. I think Trafford should take the cup games, play well and go get a move to a Chelsea, Newcastle, Spurs, or maybe even abroad if the right opportunity presents itself.
If the deal happens, then I would expect Donnarumma to play PL and CL games with Trafford playing Cup games and perhaps the CL qualification games. And pushing Donnarumma for the No. 1 spot.anyone has insight on how this impacts Trafford ? Donnarumma for cup competition/UCL and Trafford for Prem?
Whatever the original reasons were, it was a brilliant Market opportunity to buy Trafford for a cut price deal.This deal will get done today.
I've nothing against him but why bring Trafford back if you are going to do this. Doesn't seem right to me.
Ederson and Ortega contracts both expire in less than 12 months. For all we know City have been working on this all Summer. The Gala president has been talking about signing Ederson all Summer. City may have told Trafford. It does not change his status. He's still the no. 2 keeper fighting for the the no. 1 spot, but it will make it harder to play in the big games in the future if Donnarumma signs.This deal will get done today.
I've nothing against him but why bring Trafford back if you are going to do this. Doesn't seem right to me.