PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

KS55 said:
I don’t think there is anything going on behind the scenes. I can’t see why there would be.
Click to expand...

Very possibly, but then my other option was that nobody knew what they were talking about when everybody said it should be sorted out in the summer. I am OK with either :)
 
Damanino said:
rumours are the panel in the meantime had been selected in other legal cases which will limit their time allocated to this bullshit case.it could be international break in September if 2028 next time we hear anything.

:)
Click to expand...
Good points.
To the back of the pile it goes after all we ie the Panel decide what is legal or not.

I remember my long ago days in the sub contract engineering industry where end of month invoices ruled turnover and of course profit / loss. Pre computer days a job card collected productive hours (IE ones for invoice) whereas non productive hours were a drain on profit.

Needless to say among all the WIP cards was a dump card that collected non productive hours masquerading as productive which never got invoiced so was rarely found.

I feel our case is the legal equivalent of a dump card. For heavens sake don't take it out of WIP but use it to book any otherwise non productive hours.

Accountants would peruse the many cards in WIP looking for this dummy card invented for the works manager and his foremen to hide slack hours.
 
Just imagine when we are found with no case to answer, but Lord Pannick et al are later found guilty of inflating their invoices and being creative with their expenses.......
 
SatOnTheWall said:
It takes the time it takes because that is how long it takes to do the job properly.

Come on, KCs, you know what you need to do: follow the evidence and find in favour of City on every single point.
Click to expand...
No it stinks to high heaven. Any process in law that takes this long should be seriously examined and held up to ridicule. But when it involves a sports club the fact that it has been going on longer than the war in Ukraine means that a deliberate attempt has been made to damage the reputation of the accused party, independent of the substance of the charges.
This charade beginning to end has been a thundering disgrace and I am calling for the immediate publication of the findings. For god sake Enough is Enough.
 
Father Paul said:
No it stinks to high heaven. Any process in law that takes this long should be seriously examined and held up to ridicule. But when it involves a sports club the fact that it has been going on longer than the war in Ukraine means that a deliberate attempt has been made to damage the reputation of the accused party, independent of the substance of the charges.
This charade beginning to end has been a thundering disgrace and I am calling for the immediate publication of the findings. For god sake Enough is Enough.
Click to expand...
Alan Bates says hi!
 
Father Paul said:
No it stinks to high heaven. Any process in law that takes this long should be seriously examined and held up to ridicule. But when it involves a sports club the fact that it has been going on longer than the war in Ukraine means that a deliberate attempt has been made to damage the reputation of the accused party, independent of the substance of the charges.
This charade beginning to end has been a thundering disgrace and I am calling for the immediate publication of the findings. For god sake Enough is Enough.
Click to expand...
The longer it drags on the narrative will still be 115 charges and guilty,as a few have previously posted the process is the punishment,when we are cleared it’ll be pushed that we got off with it or paid people off,the whole thing is just what was set out to achieve a big horrible but clever smear campaign..
 
deano ou812 said:
The longer it drags on the narrative will still be 115 charges and guilty,as a few have previously posted the process is the punishment,when we are cleared it’ll be pushed that we got off with it or paid people off,the whole thing is just what was set out to achieve a big horrible but clever smear campaign..
Click to expand...
I always just point and laugh when 'paid off' gets mentioned in the pub/out and about.

We must be really shit if we didn't think to pay people off before the charges were announced.
 
@slbsn @Prestwich_Blue

I am trying to simplify this in my head.
Is my understanding correct that the PL charges are same/similer as the UEFA charges regarding Etihad and Etisalet.
plus Yaya image rights issue and Mancini under the table payments ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top