dadnlad
Well-Known Member
more so when admit chargeEven the very best barristers lose from time to time.
more so when admit chargeEven the very best barristers lose from time to time.
people like to dwell.Shit happens. No point agonising over it.
That was apparently also the view the ICO took once the few news articles appearedObjectively, not in the public interest now after the civil settlement. Given the victim is one of the parties to that agreement.
Feel City got rolled over on that one. Reckon they were too desperate at the time to ingratiate themselves with cunts who went on to try and destroy us.
Shit happens. No point agonising over it.
Fuck those dwellers!people like to dwell.
Think it’s more likely to be in the next fortnight than any other fortnight.Awk sure maybe next week then
I'm going to shock you when I say this, but I reckon it won't actually come out next week or the week after.Think it’s more likely to be in the next fortnight than any other fortnight.
You are consistent in your approach to the determination of these charges.I'm going to shock you when I say this, but I reckon it won't actually come out next week or the week after.
Who do you reckon gets it first? Ziegler?You will know when it’s coming because it will be leaked
Not quite true.It was nothing to do with data protection. It wasn’t hacked. Liverpool employed our scouts and the scouts took our database with them.
Full story and what happened…Can anyone point me in the direction of the Liverpool hacking thread? I'd love to know what happened there, who was at fault, and whether the outcome was sufficient or not.
TBF you need an IQ above a farmyard animal to process and store that kind of informationGo down to your local tonight and speak to any rag or dipper fan and neither will have a clue about the hacking of or scouting data base or the rags failing ffp more than Everton or forest did! All swept under the rug by the media
This is city fans and club over the next tumultuous 2 weeks once Pep is confirmed and 115:
To be fair mate,our owners thought it was a good idea to do a million pound settlement where the dippers would admit NOTHING and the incident wouldn’t be mentioned again….cant blame the PL for our owner’s stupidity,I’m pretty sure they regret it to this day.1. Was it illegal - tick
2. Did it provide a sporting advantage - tick
3. Is it against the PL rules - tick
4. Do the perpetrators play in red - tick
Result: no action by the PL, no ongoing outcry in media
Conclusion: see point 4
Because City SHAFTED themselves by taking a million quid settlement of the dippers where the scouse cunts would admit nothing,it’s all signed and now legal,so forget about it…it was our own fucking stupid fault,pretty sure Khaldoon regrets it now,especially after the red cartel pushed through the 2023 115 CHARGES SHITE….hindsight is a wonderful thing.I’ve posted in another thread on the whataboutary, why were Liverpool allowed to completely escape any form of sporting or financial sanction for what they did to City in accessing the club’s scouting software. 115 is completely different to this Southampton story, however what Liverpool did is similar in observing another team’s activity to gain a sporting advantage.
I personally second this…..Mods a new rule suggestion, anyone sharing content from Harris is met with an immediate ban. I do my best to avoid the ****. (Sorry Eric)