Totnes Blue
Well-Known Member
They have a history of "rejecting" final bids, think they will reject this one also.
Surely they won't reject this bid.
But they are only being "dragged through the mud" on a forum run by fans of the club trying to buy their player. They are acting like a bunch of twunts but being fully supported by the lick-spittle morons in the British media.Racist abuse now, eh? Standard Liverpool tactics. Love seeing that fuckwit Henry and his club dragged through the mud.
You're assuming they have "birds" (eighties alert)!If this Sterling 'thing' is anything to go by I dread to think how the cavemen of Merseyside react if their birds leave them.
They really are a disrespectful bunch of motherfuckers.
I doubt they will reject itWhat happens if they do reject it though? Can sterling force the issue himself any further?
I think they will. This is Liverpool we are talking about.I doubt they will reject it
Anyone seen pic on Twitter posted by m20 Blues of sterling posing with a man saying he expects to be with a new club by the end of the week? I'm on my phone so can't post it.
Been out all day so might off been posted already
This a briefing by city seen as both mirror and mail reporting it or chancing it?
City will probably let it sit on the table for a few weeks. If it's not accepted we will blink on the last day of the window and probably do the full £50m like Chelsea did with TorresWhat happens if they do reject it though? Can sterling force the issue himself any further?
If it's truMail also saying similar a third and final bid. If they reject this then they really are mugs.
You're hiding behind the agent. I don't think there's any place in the game for agents. PFA shuld carry out that role.I'm sorry, but I don't agree. I understand the Milner situation, but at least he behaved with dignity and professionalism. I don't have anything against Raheem Sterling per se, but his agent, well that's another story.
I have a suggestion, but I know this would never happen. But in an ideal world it would, if only to show the agents and their trumped up players who is the boss and this is it:
To start lets summarise - Liverpool have a player with 2 years left on his contract, if they don't sell now his value plummets until eventually (thanks to Bosman), he becomes a free agent. So they need to sell, but that means the player has won - I think we all agree his current actions, especially refusing to go on the pre-season is wrong - and surely a breach of his contract.
City could do with him, although I for one am not sure he is the finished article, but he is English and he has potential.
BUT HE NEEDS TO BE TAKEN DOWN A PEG OR TWO.
This is what I would love to happen - City and Liverpool agree a deal BUT IT HAPPENS IN SECRET. We will have him in 2016 and they get something like 35 million NOW. BUT and this is the key thing: for the next 12 months HE STAYS AT LIVERPOOL, he trains with the youth team, maybe sits on the bench a few times, but never actually plays. Maybe that way he will learn some humility. Liverpool will have what they want (some money to buy a strike force) we get Raheem and possibly with a different attitude. Finally, players (especially this one who has got too big for his boots) may realise that football is a team sport, and some clubs have a long and cherished history, that should'nt be shat upon like he is doing. P.S. Im not a Liverpool fan! but if he gets his own way and the transfer happens now what will stop him (and his agent) doing to us, what he is doing to Liverpool in 3 or 4 years time?
City will probably let it sit on the table for a few weeks. If it's not accepted we will blink on the last day of the window and probably do the full £50m like Chelsea did with Torres