why were the suicide bombers trying to enter the ground 10 mins into the game????
would it not have been easier to walk straight into the stadium with 10 mins to go when the gates open??
A lot of them are home grown anyway theses daysReally? Freedom of movement is a terrorist's wet dream.
This,security wise we are better in the EU
The difficulty is compounded by three things: first, the west is undefeatable in military terms, and acts of terrorism serve to underpin the west's resolve, not to undermine it. Secondly, however, the hydra-like nature of ISIS/AQ means that they too are undefeatable in military terms. We learned in Northern Ireland that asymmetric wars are unwinnable. In military terms western backed powers will before too long take back the territory under IS control, but that won't end the conflict any more than did taking Afghanistan from the taleban.
Which brings me to the third point, namely that some form of negotiated settlement is the only way this conflict can end. I take your point that it is difficult to imagine the suicide bombers sitting round the negotiating table, but some time (even if it is decades away) the higher echelons in IS/AQ will come to the table, because however long it takes it will eventually dawn on them that they can't win.
sorry but nothing could be further from the truth the Shengan agreement is a nightmare as far as controlling bordersThis,security wise we are better in the EU
That bloody EU, insisting we use home-grown terrorists instead of buying cheaper, foreign ones.A lot of them are home grown anyway theses days
I blame austerity :)That bloody EU, insisting we use home-grown terrorists instead of buying cheaper, foreign ones.
That is a good point. We need to understand the numbers involved who support radical Islam. The spectator article suggested 15 percent. I have seen something on This forum saying 0.0001 percent.
The Arab Spring had a number of causes, many of which were economic & political rather than religious. The Tunisian who famously burned himself to death was a graduate who couldn't get a job and was selling fruit by the roadside. The authorities confiscated his wares and an hour later he self-immolated. A lot of it was born of frustration about lack of jobs, corruption, authoritarianism, lack of freedoms, etc, rather than being religious in origin.I think the problem is if you cast your mind back a few years the Idea of propping up the established government during the Arab Spring would have been completely against the zeitgeist of the time. This, despite a number of people voicing concern about who exactly we were siding with. It's easy in hindsight to realise that far from liberation from tyranny as it was thought to be at the time, the Arab Spring was the rise of the new radical Islam. It was a key moment in the rise of the new Caliphate and in fact Syria today is just another chapter in that movement. The enemy isn't ISIL it is radical Islam throughout north Africa and the middle east. Action against ISIL alone will only shift the problem but will never end it.
People need to wake up to just how much sympathy there is for radical Islam and only then when the scale of the problem is admitted can a realistic strategy be formed.
2 completely different subjects. We should be voting to leave the EU anyway.I can see The UK voting to leave The EU after this.
I would imagine that's a legal issue. Over reactions are going to happen and going to war may not be the right thing in the long term. They will not be diving into all out warSo how does this affect NATO, with the French saying this is an act of war would it come under collective defence, one ally attacked = all allies attacked, now I'm sure there would have be a bit of a huddle first but isn't this one of the points of NATO.
I would imagine that's a legal issue. Over reactions are going to happen and going to war may not be the right thing in the long term. They will not be diving into all out war