EalingBlue2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 5,571
You are right we might not take free movement of labour but if we don't all the economic harm predicted will come and we will have to make huge cuts to government spending and invest a great deal using those savings and higher taxes to fill the gap not only that population growth brings but also the lost trade. This is the problem with the out vote , it is utterly split between the anti immigration element and the element that just wants cheaper labour, cheaper practises and more power centralised in London.It seems to be getting worse and we are still 'in'. I think, being on our own could help as we don't need 20+ other nations to agree
Also, you have mentioned a few times that we will 'have to accept free movement' - I disagree
Also, regime change in the Middle-East did not help but nor does their backward religion and customs that no amount of money, at least in the short/medium term can fix. I'd suggest that education is the key but the structure of these countries makes that difficult
Much of Islam around the world is not that backwards at all, the really baclwards Islam has been driven out of Saudi Arabia and parts of Afghanistan with huge funds with virtually universal support and financial aid coming from the UK and US who believes the mujahideen needed full support to fight the soviets and who believed a "pro western" Saudi regime should be supported in the Middle East at all costs even if it used huge funds to support religious extremism as that kept the population quiet and supporting their regime. The problem of Islamic extremism is something that has to be dealt with but we can take a lot of the blame. What do you expect to happen when you set free an entire military elite who are Sunni on a Shia country where they Are
Going to be oppressed and when you know Saudi etc will back them