Helmet Cole
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 8,054
List a has no benefits in it at all. You think this is a fair and unbiased representation.I think A and B just shows the "potential" harm to leaving is greater than the potential harm to staying.....it just comes down to which you see is the lesser of 2 evils...I think if most people had to decide between someones job/home "potentially" being safer if they stay and having to give up some control over the country to the EU, then they would do it....The EU has had part control over us for many years, this isnt anything new and most people in day to day life are not effected by it....now this vote is fast approaching people starting to think we weak to want to stay in and not go it alone......Someone mentioned in a post earlier......the argument isnt "IF" leaving will have a negative impact but "HOW MUCH"....even many of the "outs" admit there will be a rough ride ahead if we leave.....but no one knows how bad that will be......and thats where you need to balance out the risks for you and your families and how secure your finances are to help ride the storm...
Unsurprisingly list b seems more benign.
Is this really an intelligent presentation of the facts? If it is then the case for in is indeed compelling! Even more so when you take into account the slump in house prices and war with Russia as well.lol