Aguero banned for three games (updated)

[citizen_maine]

if you had a hearing, even if you were guilty, you'd still say something or have some kind of argument even if it's just aimed at damage limitation. Just because we're "contesting the charge" doesn't mean that we've got anything clever planned. You might as well put a case forward. Nothing to lose.

It's an extra game ban for a frivolous appeal isn't it,specifically to stop players/clubs appealing for the sake of it?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Handbags being swung and bitterness seeping out everywhere on ragcafe as we speak. Ringleader VanGaalEra coming out with some proper corkers on there. Bravo petal you're doing a grand job.

You two need to make arrangments to get together and get your 'hate fuck' over and done with.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Must have as we normally bend over and take it

well they'll just screw us over even more during the game to make up for our insolence.

 

[Marvin]

It's an extra game ban for a frivolous appeal isn't it,specifically to stop players/clubs appealing for the sake of it?

It's not an appeal. It's a hearing. They haven't decided if he's guilty. All they have done is give us notice that they are going to review the incident and we have opportunity to put forward a case. That's my understanding anyway.

 

[kaz7]

It's an extra game ban for a frivolous appeal isn't it,specifically to stop players/clubs appealing for the sake of it?

 

[CheethamHillBlue]

I read somewhere it's about 98% of the charges go through. This was from 4 or 5 years ago.
"Its Independent Regulatory Commission heard 473 cases between December 2010 and December 2011, but only two of them ended in "not guilty" verdicts."
Betfred have paid out on a 4 match ban. ;-)

 

[citizen_maine]

Or they haven't done it for years, because no-one appeals anymore :-)

 

[kaz7]

It's not an appeal. It's a hearing. They haven't decided if he's guilty. All they have done is give us notice that they are going to review the incident and we have opportunity to put forward a case. That's my understanding anyway.

I'm sure they have done the 3 ref thing hence the charge then gave us time to respond,we are contesting it and it will go to an independent panel tomorrow,anyhow we should know something late tomorrow(sky say tomorrow)

 

[cleavers]

It's an extra game ban for a frivolous appeal isn't it,specifically to stop players/clubs appealing for the sake of it?

It's not an appeal. It's a hearing. They haven't decided if he's guilty. All they have done is give us notice that they are going to review the incident and we have opportunity to put forward a case. That's my understanding anyway.

Pretty sure they can't extend it (or reduce it to 1 game), he'll be found guilty, 3 match ban, or not guilty, nothing.

Marvin is right we are contesting the charge, not appealing his guilt, which hasn't been decided yet (well in real life it has, SKY made sure of that on Sunday), but we must have something to contest it with, or we wouldn't bother (or he is injured and will miss the game anyway, so we're just making a fuss for the sake of it).

It would be hilarious if he got off, and then Pep left him on the bench. I'm not worried either way as they've already parked the bus, they're concreting it into position as we speak.

 

[Blue warrior]

Apparently ex Ref Dermot Gallagher is backing our decision believing Marriner saw the incident sorry if already posted.

 

[cleavers]

I'm sure they have done the 3 ref thing hence the charge then gave us time to respond,we are contesting it and it will go to an independent panel tomorrow,anyhow we should know something late tomorrow(sky say tomorrow)

No they've charged him, we are contesting the charge. If they had decided, he would already be banned, and we'd be appealing the ban, that's not the case.

 

[kaz7]

No they've charged him, we are contesting the charge. If they had decided, he would already be banned, and we'd be appealing the ban, that's not the case.

Ah right,thanks

 

[cleavers]

Apparently ex Rag Dermot Gallagher is backing our decision believing Marriner saw the incident sorry if already posted.

Good Mariner should be demoted then, or sent to a special hearing of specsavers at least.

 

[kippaxking79]

Apparently ex Ref Dermot Gallagher is backing our decision believing Marriner saw the incident sorry if already posted.

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&r...u3ZuinfzXZZJT1cGaRnBlg&bvm=bv.131669213,d.ZGg

Has he changed his mind since Monday then?

 

[cleavers]

Most importantly, I'm glad we've taken a stance, its about time.

 

[pete1970]

Will Tyler,Mills,Or Pete Boyle be assisting the FA making their verdict?
Or will Quinn join in?

 

[Blue warrior]

Manchester City are appealing the Aguero charge believing Marriner saw the incident - a view backed by Dermot Gallagher. [@richardajkeys]

 

[manimanc]

Apparently ex Ref Dermot Gallagher is backing our decision believing Marriner saw the incident sorry if already posted.

Are you sure as he was on Sky sports news Monday morning saying it was a definite red!! Though to be fair to the lad he was caught up in the hysteria and creaming of the pants about kun getting a ban for the derby. If he's changed his mind then fair play to him for being honest.

 

[Blue warrior]

Are you sure as he was on Sky sports news Monday morning saying it was a definite red!! Though to be fair to the lad he was caught up in the hysteria and creaming of the pants about kun getting a ban for the derby. If he's changed his mind then fair play to him for being honest.

See above mate

 

[Colm mulvenna]

When is the verdict due ?