9/11 documentary now

  • Thread starter Thread starter worsleyweb
  • Start date Start date
Your government is not averse to conducting the occasional mass murder.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide
Before you ask what's the relevance to 9/11. It's about as relevant as Operation Northwood.

A big LoL

Because this thread isnt about pakistani goverment, its about 911

Secondly if you want to discuss about bangaladesh you can create a seperate thread for it and i would be happy to answer your points
 
If there was an award for most irrevalant post of the year, you would be my nominee for this year and next year, bravo!!!!!!!!!!!
I think I'd be joint top with you which was actually my point.
Dont know whats more beliveable
For the country whose intelligence agencies propsed carrying out false flag attacks on its own soil and killing its own people previously to blame it on cubans for their war agenda only for it to be rejected by argubly the last decent president that US had who was eventually murdered ofcourse or some cave men headed by former cia agent sitting in one of the backwards country in the world carrying out such a sophisticated attack.

Following is the extract of from the propsed cia plan back in 1962
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Operation Northwoods

Operation Northwoods memorandum (13 March 1962)[1]

Lyman L. Lemnitzer, who was in charge as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation against the Cuban government, that originated within the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of theUnited States government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency(CIA) or other U.S. government operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and military targets, blaming it on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba. The proposals were rejected by the Kennedy administration.[2]

At the time of the proposal, communists led by Fidel Castro had recently taken power in Cuba. The operation proposed creating public support for a war against Cuba by blaming it for terrorist acts that would actually be perpetrated by the U.S. Government.[3] To this end, Operation Northwoods proposals recommended hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:

The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere
.

Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The operation recommended developing a "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington".
 
Yeah that's quite a gaping flaw in the theory from what I can tell. Unless they're saying the very existence of that flight was made up and that all the grieving families are just actors who've been roped into the conspiracy.


Where do you think jeffrey lieber and j j Abrams got the idea for Lost from! ;-)
 
"Water has a high heat capacity which usually precludes rapid heating to boiling temperatures, but the heat of burning jet fuel will force water to heat rapidly to boiling that causes explosions of such objects as unopened soft-drink cans or whiskey bottles. Such explains many of the explosions that survivors heard."

That'll explain the explosions pedestrians heard on the pavement many stories below. It was merely cans of lilt and sunkist exploding...
GIF-bored-Brad-Pitt-meh-Seven-skeptical-Unimpressed-unsure-whatever-GIF.gif
 

"Water has a high heat capacity which usually precludes rapid heating to boiling temperatures, but the heat of burning jet fuel will force water to heat rapidly to boiling that causes explosions of such objects as unopened soft-drink cans or whiskey bottles. Such explains many of the explosions that survivors heard."

That'll explain the explosions pedestrians heard on the pavement many stories below. It was merely cans of lilt and sunkist exploding...
GIF-bored-Brad-Pitt-meh-Seven-skeptical-Unimpressed-unsure-whatever-GIF.gif

 
It wasn't moulten aluminium that was found, it was steel.
To argue against clear facts stated by engineers, architects and physicists is futile, head in the sand behaviour.
You can also add historians.
The towers were designed to easily withstand the impact of a passenger jet at full speed.
In the last 20 years, between 500-600 high rise, steel and concrete structure building fires have been studied. Only 3 have ever collapsed. North tower, South tower and building 7.
 
It wasn't moulten aluminium that was found, it was steel.
To argue against clear facts stated by engineers, architects and physicists is futile, head in the sand behaviour.
You can also add historians.
The towers were designed to easily withstand the impact of a passenger jet at full speed.
In the last 20 years, between 500-600 high rise, steel and concrete structure building fires have been studied. Only 3 have ever collapsed. North tower, South tower and building 7.
So why are you?
 
Why am I??
Demolition experts found large quantities of nanothermite. The fires continued despite being immersed under water. Only thermite can do this.
That's just one example.
When accident investigators look at the aftermath of an event, they look at it in 4 categories. Probable cause, possible cause, improbable cause and impossible cause.
Have a look at the documentaries.
The official reports are at odds with everything from basic physics to newton's laws.
 
It wasn't moulten aluminium that was found, it was steel.
To argue against clear facts stated by engineers, architects and physicists is futile, head in the sand behaviour.
You can also add historians.
The towers were designed to easily withstand the impact of a passenger jet at full speed.
In the last 20 years, between 500-600 high rise, steel and concrete structure building fires have been studied. Only 3 have ever collapsed. North tower, South tower and building 7.

I can't think of any other buildings which have had a passenger jet crashed into at full speed. The buildings where designed to withstand a small plane I seem to remember.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top