custardpie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 476
You're not debating, although if you did I'm sure you'd be a master of itSo you only post on here for approval? Funny, I post for the debate.
You're not debating, although if you did I'm sure you'd be a master of itSo you only post on here for approval? Funny, I post for the debate.
How many times have manure suffered from the following this season:Indeed, fully appreciate where you're coming from, except that I don't see a disparity between decisions for them and decisions against them, certainly not these days. Do they get that many more decisions in their favour? Whereas in your example there probably is a huge difference in numbers.
You misunderstood me - and expressed much better the exact point I was trying to make, ie you cannot argue there isn't an issue just because the odd decision goes against them.This is most naive thing I've ever read. They have to be reasonably subtle about it or they would soon get called out.
How would you do it? I would look to stop breakaways after a foul by not playing advantage when we were attacking but not for the other team. I would deny penalties safe in the knowledge that they would not be debated on TV but not for the other team. I would not flag for offside even when there is clear daylight between players but not for the other team. I would book players for two footed reckless tackles, safe in the knowledge that it cannot be looked at due to a law the FA refuse to changes, but send off players from the other team.
I would offer penalties when the game is already won and start referring fairly once my influence ons the game had ended due to the scoreline. That's how I would do it. That's how Mason, Taylor, Clattenburg etc operate. And it's bent, there is an agenda and the whole thing stinks of Scudamore needing a strong United for his product.
You misunderstood me - and expressed much better the exact point I was trying to make, ie you cannot argue there isn't an issue just because the odd decision goes against them.
Of course they can't give every single thing in their favour, and stating that must be the case for bias to be proved is just naive.
How many times have manure suffered from the following this season:
- Two footed challenges against their player where the assailant gets a yellow instead of red
- red card for their player when it's barely even a foul
- opponents goal allowed to stand despite being yards offside
- their star player being banned retrospectively just ahead of a key match, after the ref (who was looking straight at it) claims to have "not seen" the incident.
- Obvious red card for obstruction not awarded against their closest competitor
- Opponent blatantly uses elbow or kicks out, not sent off
I can count at least a dozen such critical incidents in their favour or against us.
How many can you count the other way round?
I see what you did there :-)You're not debating, although if you did I'm sure you'd be a master of it
So tell me what you see, count out the number of times they gave actually suffered from such absurdly biased, wrong decisions going against them. I have given you actual, undeniable examples where the refs got it ridiculously "wrong" in their favour.To be fair they've had a fair few against them, we choose to ignore them the same way they've ignored everything that's gone for them and complained about bad refs against them. As fans we see what we want to see
I agree. Such a pleasure to watch a well refereed game.I thought Martin Atkinson was excellent tonight again. By far the best of the bunch.
Indeed.I agree. Such a pleasure to watch a well refereed game.
was that an agree 'indeed' or a sarcastic 'indeed' I really thought he was good tonight. Let the game flow and was fair to each side.Indeed.
So tell me what you see, count out the number of times they gave actually suffered from such absurdly biased, wrong decisions going against them. I have given you actual, undeniable examples where the refs got it ridiculously "wrong" in their favour.
Woah Cowboy. Seriously I was agreeing with you. I thought he was good tonight. It was actually refreshing to watch a game where the same standard of refereeing was applied to both sides.was that an agree 'indeed' or a sarcastic 'indeed' I really thought he was good tonight. Let the game flow and was fair to each side.
Guess there would be a massive shortage of refs for games if they got red/yellow cards for performance - so many would be suspended at any one time.Think referees should be randomly appointed to games and not picked based perceived ability and difficulty of game. Each team should get within reason an equal distribution of each ref so we can all share the crap refs. Unless a ref is a supporter of a club he should ref the game regardless of where he's from or lives. Then refs should get yellow or red cards based on performance (reviewed by retired refs) and like players they should get bans for incompetence accumulated over period of time.
That's the list I would have as well.Zlatans goal last week, laughable to be disallowed however I did laugh.
Herrera got a second yellow one game for slipping didn't he? That was a poor decision which reduced them to 10 and a key player missed the following game.
Whilst the palace game they had a few things in their favour they also scored a legitamate goal at 1-1 which was ruled out wrongly for offside and had a handball in the build up which could of been a pen.
Zlatan stooded in the knee against West Ham I think it was? Could be wrong but easily could of been a red.
There are others that are a bit more subjective so I wouldn't class then as nailed on one but certainly would do above.
They've had a lot go for them recently which has coincided with their best run of wins for a while, has it been down to Joses bitching about refs, certainly changed the last few weeks. On the whole they've got away with a bit but had some odd ones against them. I certainly wouldn't say they get let off and we get punished I think overall the refs are shockingly bad throughout.
Sorry mate. You can never tell. It was just so different to our games this season. I actually enjoyed it because I never felt he had an agenda or bias. Sad but true. Thought Spuds deserved it and feel they have a really strong first 11-13. Would never swap De Bruyne for Ericsson but would take Deli Ali, their full backs, centre backs and defensive midfield any day of the week. Looking forward to our next home game to see how we measure up.Woah Cowboy. Seriously I was agreeing with you. I thought he was good tonight. It was actually refreshing to watch a game where the same standard of refereeing was applied to both sides.
That's the list I would have as well.
Three, maybe four moderately negative and debatable decisions which is normal for any team.
As against about three games in which they should have been reduced to ten and their key striker should have been missing all of December because of suspensions.
My point is you obviously won't have every single decision go against them but just weigh the pluses and minuses this season, and during most of fergie's period, and it's blatant.