Harry Kane

[Paulmcfc2703]

Well, I’m neither shitting myself nor staring into a car’s headlight right now, but this article is an interesting read

Every ankle injury Harry Kane has had since 2016 & how long he missed

Name a more iconic duo than Harry Kane and ankle injuries. I'll wait. The Tottenham striker is no stranger to damaging his ankles, so much so that Spurs and Eng

www.90min.com

So he's missed 2-3 weeks with ankle injuries in the last 2 years.

 

[wolviedinho]

Aguero > Kane

Sergio was immense for city and will be a hard act to follow. Kane is a top level forward who will take city back to a fit kun era…smashing signing.

 

[not my fault!]

It says a £160m ‘Deal’ key word there being DEAL. It’ll include wages, bonuses, and anything else they can throw in to make it as higher fee as possible to report.

 

[SWP's back]

I've made no secret that I hoped we would sign Haaland not Kane.
That said Kane will be great signing for us and I'll look forward to supporting him playing for City! Let's pray Haaland doesn't move to one of our rivals!

This

 

[moggymoz]

Never turned up when it mattered in his life, we have no problem putting several past dross every week as is his forte. Can't get excited about this one at all.

He's better than what we have, but for me I'm not sold on it. His age, his recent fitness/injury record, the giant fee. But the worst thing about this move is that it'll rule us out from moving for Halaand, and he may end up at a domestic rival within the next 12 months. And that's something we could really live to regret.

If Halaand wasn't a possibility that's the only way this move would make sense in my opinion.

Otherwise I feel we would've been alright even for a season with just Jesus and Torres up front if we needed to, with our usual false 9 options to cover too. Until making a move for Halaand next summer if he isn't available this.

If Halaand had rejected us and moved elsewhere already then you can justify the Kane move, can't see it otherwise.

Taps ignore button.

 

[Elliot houghton]

How many years do we think we're going to get out of Kane at hes best hopefully by the time he's declining we'll also have a young striker ready to replace him

 

[oakiecokie]

Well, I’m neither shitting myself nor staring into a car’s headlight right now, but this article is an interesting read

Every ankle injury Harry Kane has had since 2016 & how long he missed

Name a more iconic duo than Harry Kane and ankle injuries. I'll wait. The Tottenham striker is no stranger to damaging his ankles, so much so that Spurs and Eng

www.90min.com

I stated PL games played played and some of those injuries were also caused by some poor challenges.Look no further than our very own Sergio who lost far more games with constant muscle injuries.
If we take either the past 6 seasons but not including 2020/21 as figures appear not to have been updated but its been 34, 38,30,37,28 and 11 = 178 and average of 30 PL per season for a centre forward is a very good return.

 

[moggymoz]

Imagine if we were in for him as well, Kane and Haaland up front

Haha, there is is no chance the Rags are signing Haaland let alone Kane...

 

[mattyb]

Excited & pissed so I’ve decided to step out of self exile……. Loads of business has been done today!

More ins and outs than a soho brass house!

 

[ninjamonkey]

It says a £160m ‘Deal’ key word there being DEAL. It’ll include wages, bonuses, and anything else they can throw in to make it as higher fee as possible to report.

Kidding yourself if you think that's going to include his wages mate. They want to claim he's getting 400k a week that's over 20m a year, he's likely going to get a 5 year deal minimum, there's 100m in wages. Even if you say the figures are bullshit, there's no way he's getting less than half that so the wages alone would make up far too much of that deal to be combined. The figure may or may not be bullshit but they aren't including wages and reporting it as a package at that figure.