Cole Palmer

I wanted him to stay, but it is clear that he is not very good off the ball.

question does Anyone would have Palmer over Grealish or Doku
 
He’s obviously a good player, but I do think people are getting a little carried away. 8 of his 16 league goals have been penalties. Not saying he isn’t good, but if he wasn’t Chelsea’s penalty taker he’d have 8 goals, against much fewer deep blocks than what we face, and hardly anyone would be saying we’re desperately missing him. He only has 1 more non-penalty goal than Rodri.
 
Last edited:
Are we allowed to say he's starting to look the dog's bollocks? Or will that upset the wimps?

200.gif
 
Are we allowed to say he's starting to look the dog's bollocks? Or will that upset the wimps?
You can say what you want. It seems the wimpy posts come from those who don’t accept others don’t rate him as highly as others but still rate him as a good player.
Last night was the perfect example as to why he probably wasn’t the best fit at City.
Does some great things and has eye catching moments but tries to do to much and loses it a lot.
Chelsea and their tactics of having no tactics suits him to the ground.
Good luck to him.
 
You can say what you want. It seems the wimpy posts come from those who don’t accept others don’t rate him as highly as others but still rate him as a good player.
Last night was the perfect example as to why he probably wasn’t the best fit at City.
Does some great things and has eye catching moments but tries to do to much and loses it a lot.
Chelsea and their tactics of having no tactics suits him to the ground.
Good luck to him.
Sounds a lot like foden a few years ago. Slowing the game down and making the right decisions comes with age/ more games.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.