PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Further reductions to printing costs?
Excuse me, how dare you surmise that the dog would stoop that low.
Nothing magic about this mutt. He's Tragic Twat...
GOULDYBOBS
Well-Known Member
And he'd shag your dog too if he could
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,711
Wonder if Stefan bought his mates lunch today?
patrickblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Jun 2006
- Messages
- 110
For the uninitiated amongst us, namely me, who is magic twat?
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,439
Yeah, it probably needs a bit of reading up, but he's a ****
some silly pillock who has a monstrous Bee in his little brain, that keeps telling the public that City are a crime against humanity and should be chucked out of the league for good
Manchester1894
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 6,522
Tomorrow marks the last day of the current break from the Premier League. Timing wise, this was the perfect window of opportunity to put this to bed, but to be fair to the league and the club it's a matter totally out of their control and I think rightly the independent panel are getting pelters for the delay.
I still have confidence in the club prevailing, but I'd be a liar if I didn't say there is a tiny bit of me that's still concerned. I don't know if it's negativity bourne out of the ticketing policy and the way the club have really ignored the core fan base. You can see why we don't look at all likely to clear the non-cooperation charge, lol
I still have confidence in the club prevailing, but I'd be a liar if I didn't say there is a tiny bit of me that's still concerned. I don't know if it's negativity bourne out of the ticketing policy and the way the club have really ignored the core fan base. You can see why we don't look at all likely to clear the non-cooperation charge, lol
Mancini Manus Domini
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 1,795
I dip in and out of this thread, so apologies if this has already been covered.
If I recall correctly from our other case against the Premier League we obtained a disclosure of Premier League emails. If there was something incriminating related to this case, how might it affect things? If say the Premier League were colluding with other clubs to bring about our charges, how might that impact the panel reviewing our case?
Is the panel's remit only confined to judging our case? If something unusual or untoward cropped up regarding the prosecuting party, what powers does the panel have to deal with it?
If I recall correctly from our other case against the Premier League we obtained a disclosure of Premier League emails. If there was something incriminating related to this case, how might it affect things? If say the Premier League were colluding with other clubs to bring about our charges, how might that impact the panel reviewing our case?
Is the panel's remit only confined to judging our case? If something unusual or untoward cropped up regarding the prosecuting party, what powers does the panel have to deal with it?
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,080
Even Epsteins emails are getting leaked & rich powerful men have no fucking filter so you can only imagine what’s in them……
Well he 100% doesn’t shag his wife
kurious oranj
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
nmc
Well-Known Member
That’s bit harsh….
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
more like she doesnt shag him