He was fine, to an extent.
As a ball player, he's lacking. At least right now. It's possible that if he has a serious work ethic he could get himself up to a reasonable standard with good coaching.
As a keeper it's way too early to judge, but he does have a good reputation coming into City. I haven't seen enough of him to compare him to Ederson.
He did one fine piece of sweeping though. That's a big positive looking ahead.
As an aside, Bravo was generally as good a no.2 as you could ask for. Barring the old classic moment here and there, his goalkeeping was very good and his distribution was mostly excellent.
As a ball player, he's lacking. At least right now. It's possible that if he has a serious work ethic he could get himself up to a reasonable standard with good coaching.
As a keeper it's way too early to judge, but he does have a good reputation coming into City. I haven't seen enough of him to compare him to Ederson.
He did one fine piece of sweeping though. That's a big positive looking ahead.
As an aside, Bravo was generally as good a no.2 as you could ask for. Barring the old classic moment here and there, his goalkeeping was very good and his distribution was mostly excellent.