If it goes directly to his body,
YES!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
31 | Ederson - 2024/25
- Thread starter MCFCFanTX
- Start date
YES!
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,819
Then you will slate 100% of keepers. He has no time to react and nearly saved it.If it goes directly to his body,
YES!
A keeper either gets lucky in that situation or it goes in.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
Eddy was at fault for the first goal - no question about it. Parried the ball straight in front of him, nearly a great save from the header though.
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 38,900
Once his passes through the lines and long were sussed, he just became average.
ninjamonkey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 18,672
Striker gets a towering header with plenty of power at goal from 3 yards out and there's morons blaming him for not saving it? Bloody hell. He was very close to a sensational save. If that's haaland scoring for us, would anybody be saying the keeper should have saved it? Of course not because that would be a mental thing to suggest.
It's funny how the same people had nothing to say when Ortega gave away a penalty at anfield and didn't save salahs effort/pass which was reachable, nor did they say anything when he should be saving palace's first goal either.
It's funny how the same people had nothing to say when Ortega gave away a penalty at anfield and didn't save salahs effort/pass which was reachable, nor did they say anything when he should be saving palace's first goal either.
Bluewonder
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 3,534
His keeping for the first attempt in that sequence was very poor. He was unfortunate for the actual goal.Striker gets a towering header with plenty of power at goal from 3 yards out and there's morons blaming him for not saving it? Bloody hell. He was very close to a sensational save. If that's haaland scoring for us, would anybody be saying the keeper should have saved it? Of course not because that would be a mental thing to suggest.
It's funny how the same people had nothing to say when Ortega gave away a penalty at anfield and didn't save salahs effort/pass which was reachable, nor did they say anything when he should be saving palace's first goal either.
Bluewars II
Well-Known Member
It's up for him. Always been a shite shot stopper.
nellyonthewing
Well-Known Member
It hit him he didn’t save it.Striker gets a towering header with plenty of power at goal from 3 yards out and there's morons blaming him for not saving it? Bloody hell. He was very close to a sensational save. If that's haaland scoring for us, would anybody be saying the keeper should have saved it? Of course not because that would be a mental thing to suggest.
It's funny how the same people had nothing to say when Ortega gave away a penalty at anfield and didn't save salahs effort/pass which was reachable, nor did they say anything when he should be saving palace's first goal either.
I think that is very harsh. I don’t blame ederson at all personallyEddy was at fault for the first goal - no question about it. Parried the ball straight in front of him, nearly a great save from the header though.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
.I think that is very harsh. I don’t blame ederson at all personally