WNRH said:
Lets take it away from football then and use a restaurant as an example.
Who is more loyal?
Someone who goes every week to the restaurant spending £50 each time or someone who saves up every week to go to that restaurant and spends £50 each time?
Every system that will be used for this will be flawed, and both you are wireblue are right but then i too am also right, the weird thing is is that none of us are wrong, what we can all agree on though is that this system we use is the best at the moment but it is so flawed that it doesn't actually award the loyalty of some people.
But the restaurant exampel you've used isn't the same argument you were making.
The same argument would be for me to pay £500 at the start of the year for 19 meals whereas you save up each week and occasionally go for an "early bird special" at £15 a meal.
Also what you're not takign into consideration is those who pay up front run the risk of later circumstances meaning they've paid for a game they subsequently can't attend. If you're a citycard holder and you can't make a game you don't buy that game, simple. I, assuming we beat Notts County, can't make the Fulham game as it'll be moved to the Sunday and I'm in Prague on a stag do. I also, unless the game is moved for TV, can't make the West Ham game on the 30th April as the wedding for the stag do I'm on for the Fulham game is on that day. I have already paid approx £27 for each of those games. I should be rewarded more than a pay-as-you-go fan for this initial outlay.