50 years since man landed on the Moon

Apparently, 50 years ago today, a bloke from America landed on some planet somewhere. There he found a scouser who quipped 'It's our year next year la'. To this day, the yank still doesn't know where his space caps went.
 
dronefromsector7G said:
Who filmed Armstrong getting out?
Click to expand...
Hope this helps.

npjo94.png
 
Did they visit the sea of tranquility? Only this thread is about the moon but there is plenty of fishing going on(and plenty of catches).
 
Can't believe grown adults still believe this giant hoax/fraud.

The different angles of shadows of the supposed astronauts (more accurately, astronots) on the alleged moon surface, is all the proof I need no man has ever been on the moon.
With one light source only (the sun), the angle of shadows of any objects will all be the same, yet it wasn't on the so called moon landings.
 
Eaglechief said:
Can't believe grown adults still believe this giant hoax/fraud.

The different angles of shadows of the supposed astronauts (more accurately, astronots) on the alleged moon surface, is all the proof I need no man has ever been on the moon.
With one light source only (the sun), the angle of shadows of any objects will all be the same, yet it wasn't on the so called moon landings.
Click to expand...
Most of us educated lot can't believe you think it's fake.

Passes the time though.
 
malg said:
So, it was definitely a hoax then?
Click to expand...

The shadows don't lie my friend, everything else can be convincingly contrived/excused away, but not the angle(s) of shadow, when there is only one light source on the moon surface.
Basic physics and photography being applied my friend.

(I'm not a "flat earther" by the way).
 
Eaglechief said:
The shadows don't lie my friend, everything else can be convincingly contrived/excused away, but not the angle(s) of shadow, when there is only one light source on the moon surface.
Basic physics and photography being applied my friend.

(I'm not a "flat earther" by the way).
Click to expand...
You're right, shadows don't lie. So if there were multiple lighting sources, objects would cast multiple shadows (especially when the shadows are so clearly defined suggesting a strong light source) but they don't. The arguments I have seen all relate to parallelity which has been explained.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.