Please try, I'm interested to read what you've got to say.
Simply look at the stats themselves, the positions the players play, and their overall involvement in play.
It’s impossible to compare two players contributions to a team without recognizing their overall contribution in the game, which is often not conveyed in their statistics.
For instance, is Ruben Dias one of the best playmakers in the League? But he has a ridiculously high number of passes and completed passes! One would think that he is one of the best playmakers ever to play football given his stats! What of Laporte? Same same.
As a left winger, look at Sterlings crosses! Should he be dinged for that? Depends on your view of his overall contribution and the manner in which we utilize him on our left side…hence my only concerns about Sterling being his shortfalls in technique and tendency to run down blind alleys, which calls into question his decision-making.
It seems that it’s all or nothing on here: Sterling is brilliant or shit!
I think he’s neither, but he has flavor of both in certain aspects of his game, and have praised the good parts and panned the bad. I think that is giving the player a fair shake and an assessment borne of actually watching his in game contributions, rather than selected stats.