8 PL Clubs vote against blocking related-party loans | 7 against blocking related transactions

[MCFC1993]

Not sure what it’s got to do with City? Have we ever signed a player on loan from one of the other City clubs?

Lampard is the only one that's actually played for us I think.

 

[bluenova]

Mooey(?). Signed from Melbourne and loaned to Huddersfield??

Don't think that counts.

We bought Mooy, and then loaned him out. The situation this would cover is if we loaned him from Melbourne.

We have had plenty of loans of City players OUT of the Premier League, so if Spain introduced this rule, we'd have to make changes, but as someone has said, Lampard is the only one that would have fallen foul of a PL rule.

 

[Man_City_Loyal]

I’ve just sent him an initial 8 names:

Rocco Acerra, 29.
Bruno Balli, 50.
Alfons Bos, 35.
Giancarlo Bruschera, 21.
Andrea Casula, 11.
Giovanni Casula, 44.
Nino Cerullo, 24.
Willy Chielens, 41.

He probably won't have a clue.

 

[Man_City_Loyal]

Lampard is the only one that's actually played for us I think.

Didn't it come out, that he never signed for New York before us, it was a free transfer from Chelsea? and then of course he spent a season here before going to New York?

 

[MCFC1993]

Didn't it come out, that he never signed for New York before us, it was a free transfer from Chelsea? and then of course he spent a season here before going to New York?

Yeah I think you're right actually.

So for incoming players we haven't actually used it.

 

[Tb1981]

Might as well change the rules to whatever United, Liverpool and Arsenal want. Only then will we have true parity...

Carragher is a cock
Knows nothing apart from tactics, same as Neville
Owns a hotel and a tiny shitty club
They think they can provide insight on everything
The reason it’s such a high amount of votes (14) required is to make it difficult to vote new things in unless they are for the benefit of all parties
Like for example a rule change mid season to prevent one team from doing something within the rules.

 

[Goater=Legend]

Sorry if this has already been discussed.

Is this not the same thing that Watford have been doing for years and nobody gave a shit about?

 

[TonyM]

Whoever the independent regulator is they should have no allegiance to a club, no knowledge of the game, never have played the game, no idea what offside is, sexist i know but no penis, no legs or hands, and barely a head.

 

[halfcenturyup]

The reason it’s such a high amount of votes (14) required is to make it difficult to vote new things in unless they are for the benefit of all parties.

That's right. Like Brexit.

Whoops (too soon?) :)

 

[BeerIsTheBest]

Sorry if this has already been discussed.

Is this not the same thing that Watford have been doing for years and nobody gave a shit about?

Yes mate but this farce is directly about Newcastle being able to strengthen without a massive spend and threaten a top four place.