Matty said:
Santiago Street . said:
So in your world raping children is as bad as making unpopular ( to a small yet hysterically vocal minority) economic policy decisions is it ?
Sweet Jesus, did you actually read what I wrote, or just decided to make a sensationalist statement based on nothing I'd remotely stated or implied?
My usage of Gary Glitter was to demonstrate an extreme. People run the gambit from the likes of Adolf Hitler at one end of the spectrum to Mother Theresa at the other. My point was not eveyone deserves to be respected en masse simply becuase they were a well known figure, and died. Their actions when alive should dictate the amount of respect they are afforded when they die. Gary Glitter clearly should fall on the "no respect given" side of that line for the vast majority, in the same way as Ghandi should fall on the "respect paid" side of the line for most. Thatcher is one of those people who fall in the "grey area", some will respect her whereas others will hate her with a passion and afford her no respect whatsoever. So, no, I was not equating paedophillia with far right political actions. A sensible, intelligent human being could see that in an instance.
You're right, I withdraw that.
I'm not arguing that we should have a minutes silence for her just that if one were held it should be observed properly by those who disagreed with her policies. Walking out is fine, failure to remove headwear or to stand up is fine but to actively disrupt it is the act of a scumbag.
Referring to your "grey area" surely 99.9% of people fall within that. Should she be respected en masse ? You bet she should, she was more than just a well known public figure.
I do wonder why the hatred of her is quite so vitriolic. When Blair dies I doubt the hatred of him will be quite so visceral despite his Iraq war legacy.
In a nutshell though unless a man has committed terrible crimes anybody revelling in his death reveals themself to be a stupid, bitter, smallminded knob