pominoz
Well-Known Member
Ancient Citizen said:pominoz said:Damocles said:I see no problem with the above.
The Church is a private club. It has its own rules and code of ethics to join. If you don't follow those code of ethics, you get kicked out of that club.
It's nothing to do with us how the Church treats its members outside of the wider moral implications of society.
Banning women shows them to be hypocrites, especially as they worship a guy who spent most of his later life going round and preaching about social justice and equality, but if we have to post in this thread every time a religious institution shows themselves to be a hypocrite then we would literally be here all day.
This is a big issue in Australia at the moment, as,
"In recent weeks the issue of ''faith-based'' organisations being allowed to discriminate against its employees and those in its care has reached a level of public discussion that is unprecedented in Australia. That's because attitudes have changed.
At issue is the fact that religious organisations are very large employers. They run hospitals, charity groups, nursing homes, employment services and schools. In doing so, these groups have long argued for exemptions to Commonwealth anti-discrimination laws on the grounds of "religious freedom".
In truth this matter is all about maintaining homophobia, not religious freedom."
I can not believe that our "Atheist" PM has bent over for these arseholes.
Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/exemptions-for-religious-groups-keep-fears-alive-20130121-2d2f8.html#ixzz2IfPfI8Kq" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/exempt ... z2IfPfI8Kq</a>
Your atheist PM is obviously more pragmatic and deep thinking then. As Damo said the church, ( in the broadest sense, Christian, muslim, mormon, whatever) is a club, with it's own rules and if you don't like them, or think them homophobic, misogynistic, or archaic then don't join.
It has nothing to do with being a member of their "club", they run schools, hospitals, hostels and even employment agencies, funded by tax payers. They have the right to sack a single mother, anyone that is openly gay or someone of a different religion/no religion that is working for them, on those grounds only.
If they are taking my tax money to help run their business's, they should abide by the laws that any other business has to.
"I hesitate to say this but the Prime Minister is living in sin. I don't give a damn. Nor do most Australians. But that sort of thing bothers religious leaders. So much that Labor's Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill will renew their authority to bar anyone in Julia Gillard's shoes from any job in any of their schools, hospitals and charities, even those they run with public money.
It's a curious spectacle, a prime minister legislating against herself.
Only school funding is as heavily defended by bishops, orthodox rabbis and imams as the "freedom" to punish these sinners in the workplace.
Should she wish to work some day as, say, a cleaner in an Anglican hostel, she could solve the problem by marrying. But the woman who will be shepherding the legislation through the Senate really hasn't a hope. The new law will back any faith-based organisation that refuses to hire Penny Wong if having a lesbian on the payroll injures "the religious sensitivities of adherents of that religion".
Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/gillards-bizarre-act-of-faith-leaves-vulnerable-unprotected-20130113-2cnf0.html#ixzz2IhMcmmlS" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politi ... z2IhMcmmlS</a>