if...what...makes...me...feel...better...?riley347 said:Davs 19 said:pudge said:You didn't go to school very often did you?
Just a bit of keyboard confusion, me thinks....
correct dave....but if it makes him feel better....
if...what...makes...me...feel...better...?riley347 said:Davs 19 said:pudge said:You didn't go to school very often did you?
Just a bit of keyboard confusion, me thinks....
correct dave....but if it makes him feel better....
Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot said:el blue said:I remember Mancini saying something along the lines of "it's good to have adam johnson back because we don't have any other players like him", think this was 2 seasons ago. Since then we haven't brought anybody else in of that ilk and now were letting AJ go. In Mancini we trust but it does make me wonder.
2 seasons ago he actually put a shit in and was showing signs of improvment!
Thing is he could be looking good on the pitch to an every day average Joe like me or you but much like the situation with Song at Arsenal, Wenger came out and said the reason he's fucked him off is because he rolls in training late and is lazy!
I wouldn't be suprised if Johnson has still had runnings with Roberto over going out getting pissed, poor training standards and just genuinely being lazy!
Last thing we need is a Michael Johnson MkII
Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot said:el blue said:I remember Mancini saying something along the lines of "it's good to have adam johnson back because we don't have any other players like him", think this was 2 seasons ago. Since then we haven't brought anybody else in of that ilk and now were letting AJ go. In Mancini we trust but it does make me wonder.
2 seasons ago he actually put a shit in and was showing signs of improvment!
Thing is he could be looking good on the pitch to an every day average Joe like me or you but much like the situation with Song at Arsenal, Wenger came out and said the reason he's fucked him off is because he rolls in training late and is lazy!
I wouldn't be suprised if Johnson has still had runnings with Roberto over going out getting pissed, poor training standards and just genuinely being lazy!
Last thing we need is a Michael Johnson MkII
BringBackSwales said:Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot said:el blue said:I remember Mancini saying something along the lines of "it's good to have adam johnson back because we don't have any other players like him", think this was 2 seasons ago. Since then we haven't brought anybody else in of that ilk and now were letting AJ go. In Mancini we trust but it does make me wonder.
2 seasons ago he actually put a shit in and was showing signs of improvment!
Thing is he could be looking good on the pitch to an every day average Joe like me or you but much like the situation with Song at Arsenal, Wenger came out and said the reason he's fucked him off is because he rolls in training late and is lazy!
I wouldn't be suprised if Johnson has still had runnings with Roberto over going out getting pissed, poor training standards and just genuinely being lazy!
Last thing we need is a Michael Johnson MkII
is he constipated? Maybe if he had put more shits in he would have got more starts?
Rammy Blue said:LoveCity said:Not long now...
Martin O'Neill is striving to bring Adam Johnson to Sunderland after his chairman, Ellis Short, agreed to finance a deal for the Manchester City winger.
After Roberto Mancini, City's manager, reluctantly decided to allow the 25-year-old to leave the Etihad Stadium, a £10m price was set which is understood to have been met by five clubs. Johnson, who has recently been the subject of interest from Everton and Newcastle United, is believed to have turned two of those teams down but has not rejected Sunderland.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/aug/20/sunderland-manchester-city-adam-johnson?newsfeed=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012 ... sfeed=true</a>
The only question I have from that is if five clubs met the £10million asking price so fast, perhaps we should have set his value closer to £15million?
It's like a fucking wind-up, isn't it?
We must be the worst selling club ever, hopefully Soriano will sort this shit out.
We should have set the bar at 20mil and let clubs work up to that figure, fucking madness.
Stoned Rose said:City are so far ahead with technology they're even doing stool samples.
LoveCity said:Not long now...
Martin O'Neill is striving to bring Adam Johnson to Sunderland after his chairman, Ellis Short, agreed to finance a deal for the Manchester City winger.
After Roberto Mancini, City's manager, reluctantly decided to allow the 25-year-old to leave the Etihad Stadium, a £10m price was set which is understood to have been met by five clubs. Johnson, who has recently been the subject of interest from Everton and Newcastle United, is believed to have turned two of those teams down but has not rejected Sunderland.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/aug/20/sunderland-manchester-city-adam-johnson?newsfeed=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012 ... sfeed=true</a>
The only question I have from that is if five clubs met the £10million asking price so fast, perhaps we should have set his value closer to £15million?