Additional time

[JewelZee]

That’s because you’re twisting facts round corners to suit your opinion.

Like what? Give me an example...

 

[Bluemoonadam]

You watched us last season we seemed to shut up shop play the game out with our possession!

Well in certain games it'll be to our benefit ie Everton 1-1 at home notts forest away 1-1 both games we should of won i reckon with an extra ten minutes added on in either of them games that we'd of taken all 3 points. With regards to us holding onto our leads at the end it'll be simple we will have to finish more of the chances we get to counter that scenario.

 

[SWP's back]

Like what? Give me an example...

Ignoring the fact that we score more goals per minute and concede the fewest over a season and thus more minutes would benefit us greater.

Ignoring the fact we’re far more likely to go into 90 minutes two or more goals up than one goal up.

Ignoring the fact that it’s incredibly rare that we’re beaten by more than a goal and thus an extra 6-8 minutes to get that goal is only likely to suit us.

Ignoring the fact that every time we dropped points last this this entire forum was kicking off about time wasting in the post match thread and wanting the authorities to clamp down on it.

They’ll do for now.

 

[elbearos]

Pep mentioned the 45 second for every goal scored and it's common knowledge it's 30 seconds for each sub!

You can't find referees rules online or anywhere in text! So it's all whatever the referee decides then!

Typical chaos by the way authorities treat paying fans! Premier and the fa as well all seem to be outdated and reactionary...

If it's 30 seconds for each sub, what if two or three are subbed, at the same time,is it 30, or 60,90, what if both teams sun at the same time?

 

[SWP's back]

If it's 30 seconds for each sub, what if two or three are subbed, at the same time,is it 30, or 60,90, what if both teams sun at the same time?

30 per break.

 

[SWP's back]

Well that gets my vote then.

I’d be happy enough with that. Clock stops every time the balls is dead like in rugby and everyone knows exactly where they stand.

 

[JewelZee]

Ignoring the fact that we score more goals per minute and concede the fewest over a season and thus more minutes would benefit us greater.

Ignoring the fact we’re far more likely to go into 90 minutes two or more goals up than one goal up.

Ignoring the fact that it’s incredibly rare that we’re beaten by more than a goal and thus an extra 6-8 minutes to get that goal is only likely to suit us.

Ignoring the fact that every time we dropped points last this this entire forum was kicking off about time wasting in the post match thread and wanting the authorities to clamp down on it.

They’ll do for now.

Everything I said ACTUALLY occurred, yes or no? Example, would you rather play 3 to 5 minutes of extra time up 2 goals or 10 to 12? And if the outcome is more or less decided by the 90 minute mark do we need to add those 100 or so minutes to our legs over those 24 games (I'll let you do the math since you're such a smart guy) as a reward for the other team's shithousing?

Just don't act like a smug knobhead like you're some mic dropping prick. I made it clear that I respected SkyBlueFlux' opinion.

Homie don't play that...

 

[SWP's back]

Everything I said ACTUALLY occurred, yes or no? Example, would you rather play 3 to 5 minutes of extra time up 2 goals or 10 to 12? And if the outcome is more or less decided by the 90 minute mark do we need to add those 100 or so minutes to our legs over those 24 games (I'll let you do the math since you're such a smart guy) as a reward for the other team's shithousing?

Just don't act like a smug knobhead like you're some mic dropping prick. I made it clear that I respected SkyBlueFlux' opinion.

Homie don't play that...

I’d rather play the most amount of minutes with the ball in play as was intended when the laws of the game were originally written.

If you want to wear your tinfoil hat and have a fanny wobble then go for it, you sound like a bellend and your respect is not something I crave. No interest in speaking to you further so I’ll do us both a favour and hit ignore.

 

[hertsblue]

Look at yesterday. Those extra 4 minutes benefited Arsenal.

Like a lot have said. City don't normally need injury time as the job is usually done. If a team like Everton for example get through 90 minutes one nil down and fancy it, another 10 minutes is enough. Our players aren't immune to tiredness.

Even Pep has criticised the new added time law./rule.

It won't last long. As soon as Liverpool and united start conceding 96th minute goals it will be binned.

What got me yesterday was Atwell playing on the extra time in extra time with Arsenal attacking but when we won the ball and we’re about to attack he immediately blew for full time when you know if Arsenal has retained the ball he would have let their attack continue

 

[Blue_eyes]

Probably been said already but this additional time rule is scary for the better teams.

If you are likely to be leading at 90mins it only benefits your opposition.

If you time waste against a better team to "have a go" for the last five mins it benefits you.

If you play in less games for the season it benefits you.

Also, it gives greater control to the match officials to implement their desire for an outcome linked to their idea of "entertainment value".

If the above isnt true then why not have an official timekeeper so when play stops the clock stops, so no need for guessing added time etc.......is it cos they dont want to relinquish this control.

Somone told me that we only actually played seven minutes extra yesterday, is this because arse scored and penalties was deemed good entertainment.

If arse hadnt scored would we have had eight mins + more added? who knows, but I dont trust it myself.

Hope the club have someone to collect stats to see how it is used for various clubs/situations.

It could make for interesting reading.