I don't like that cartoon one bit. Smacks of racism, but City are the current symbol of wealth in the game. Point taken about that.matty barton said:Trollsmoan said:Have you gave an answer why the chose that particular banner then Matty? why not a Russian, oil barrel or dollar bill?
It's a dig at the Arabs like the digs from all the other pundits, media and fans since they started getting into football ownership and that's my opinion.
Because it was in a match against you? I don't know if it actually was, but that would seem logical. If not, then because you/the sheikh are the most recent/most extreme example of what they have an issue with.
If anyone wanted to have a racist dig at Arabs for being Arabs they'd pick on stuff like terrorism,human rights, womens rights, oil prices, honour killings, Islam etc etc
Ajax will still win stuff domestically. They were out of contention in Europe years before City came along.City have so fair failed in Europe and even got beat by poor little impoverished Ajax. They ripped the piss ouy of United when they plated them in the Europa Shite League last season.I think a lot of you are not reading this one correctly.
The general point of football being dominated by money is an easy and obvious one - but that obviously extends way beyond football into every facet of society. It's not City who carved up the European Cup and Football League and replaced it with the Champions League and Premiership. Commercial interests and the twisting of football's rules to suit the wealthy started a long time before City's takeover. We are an easy ogre.