The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 11,023
- Team supported
- City
Is he there to ‘Get Nexit Done’.
Alexandole Boris de Pfeffel Johnson
- Thread starter hilts
- Start date
Is he there to ‘Get Nexit Done’.
TheBlueDune
Well-Known Member
Imagine the interview.
Why do you think you'd be good as NATO General Secretary?
Ahh, yes, well, bumble mumble, as Plato would have said, look, a squirrel.
And, I love Churchill.
Oh yes, and I am friends with an ex-KGB agent and his son.
A million a year should be enough.
Plus expenses of course.
And any good totty round here? Love them in a uniform if possible.
TheBlueDune
Well-Known Member
Can't think what the problem may be, as today's story in the Guardian highlights.
UK health department played ‘fast and loose’ when awarding Covid contracts to Randox
Commons public accounts committee issues damning report into £777m of contracts given to firm that employed Owen Paterson as lobbyist
www.theguardian.com
Ministers and government officials played “fast and loose” when awarding £777m in Covid contracts to a healthcare firm that employed the Conservative MP Owen Paterson as a lobbyist, the head of parliament’s spending watchdog has said.
In a damning report, the House of Commons public accounts committee (PAC) concluded that the government made a series of failures, making it impossible to know if the contracts had been awarded properly to Randox.
The Department of Health and Social Care did little to deal with potential conflicts of interests despite “clear concerns” about Randox’s political connections, the cross-party committee of MPs found.
It added that officials were aware Paterson had been in direct contact with Matt Hancock, who was then the health secretary, while promoting Randox.
The MPs found that Randox made “substantial” profits after it was given the contracts to carry out Covid testing during the pandemic.
The firm’s profits in the year to June 2021 were “more than 100 times greater” than the previous year, according to the PAC, which questioned whether they were excessive.
In its latest accounts, Randox reported a profit of £177m for the year to 30 June 2021. The MPs said this compared with a profit of £1.2m that Randox reported for the 18 months up to 30 June 2020.
In case anybody has forgotten, Owen Paterson was the MP employed by Randox for £100k/year when Boris tried to change the rules to avoid him being sacked. I am confident that Boris, as far as he was aware, did not enjoy any monies or benefits by him or any of his ministers passed on being directly connected with this good fortune for Randox and believed that they were purely coincidental.
The Parliamentary Standards Commissioner report - said Paterson had "repeatedly used his privileged position to benefit two companies for whom he was a paid consultant, and that this has brought the house into disrepute" and that "no previous case of paid advocacy has seen so many breaches or such a clear pattern of behaviour in failing to separate private and public interests".
Small tip of the huge iceberg.
Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,910
This is very unfair.
He is obviously very well qualified for this job - just look at how he has cleverly developed an inside track on some dodgy KGB spooks!
He‘ll be busy milking them for information by convincing them that he’s just a bumbling fool who doesn’t have a clue what he’s doing.
Cunning eh!???
threespires
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 6,427
- Team supported
- City
"Erotically unbridled" definitely should be a part of the lexicon on here and elsewhere.
And he's not wrong either is he, in a world full of mad ideas Johnson as Sec Gen of NATO is up there with the best of them.
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
That’s before the links with ministers, their hedge funds/investments and Pfizer and Moderna are fully revealed. There’s a reason AZ got trashed and it wasn’t to do with efficacy…….Can't think what the problem may be, as today's story in the Guardian highlights.
UK health department played ‘fast and loose’ when awarding Covid contracts to Randox
Commons public accounts committee issues damning report into £777m of contracts given to firm that employed Owen Paterson as lobbyist
Ministers and government officials played “fast and loose” when awarding £777m in Covid contracts to a healthcare firm that employed the Conservative MP Owen Paterson as a lobbyist, the head of parliament’s spending watchdog has said.
In a damning report, the House of Commons public accounts committee (PAC) concluded that the government made a series of failures, making it impossible to know if the contracts had been awarded properly to Randox.
The Department of Health and Social Care did little to deal with potential conflicts of interests despite “clear concerns” about Randox’s political connections, the cross-party committee of MPs found.
It added that officials were aware Paterson had been in direct contact with Matt Hancock, who was then the health secretary, while promoting Randox.
The MPs found that Randox made “substantial” profits after it was given the contracts to carry out Covid testing during the pandemic.
The firm’s profits in the year to June 2021 were “more than 100 times greater” than the previous year, according to the PAC, which questioned whether they were excessive.
In its latest accounts, Randox reported a profit of £177m for the year to 30 June 2021. The MPs said this compared with a profit of £1.2m that Randox reported for the 18 months up to 30 June 2020.
In case anybody has forgotten, Owen Paterson was the MP employed by Randox for £100k/year when Boris tried to change the rules to avoid him being sacked. I am confident that Boris, as far as he was aware, did not enjoy any monies or benefits by him or any of his ministers passed on being directly connected with this good fortune for Randox and believed that they were purely coincidental.
The Parliamentary Standards Commissioner report - said Paterson had "repeatedly used his privileged position to benefit two companies for whom he was a paid consultant, and that this has brought the house into disrepute" and that "no previous case of paid advocacy has seen so many breaches or such a clear pattern of behaviour in failing to separate private and public interests".
Small tip of the huge iceberg.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Johnson tied to a table with a circular saw heading to his genitals - " Oh come on Lebedev do you expect me just to talk?"
"Ex" KGB officer - " No Mr Johnson nor do I expect you to die. We will bung you a couple of lines and a couple of busty blonde hookers then I am sure you will sing like a canary"
Shadz69
Well-Known Member
Tip of the iceberg is bang on, not the time now but there's huge worries about the awarding of recent defence contracts related to Ukraine. ££££££££Can't think what the problem may be, as today's story in the Guardian highlights.
UK health department played ‘fast and loose’ when awarding Covid contracts to Randox
Commons public accounts committee issues damning report into £777m of contracts given to firm that employed Owen Paterson as lobbyist
Ministers and government officials played “fast and loose” when awarding £777m in Covid contracts to a healthcare firm that employed the Conservative MP Owen Paterson as a lobbyist, the head of parliament’s spending watchdog has said.
In a damning report, the House of Commons public accounts committee (PAC) concluded that the government made a series of failures, making it impossible to know if the contracts had been awarded properly to Randox.
The Department of Health and Social Care did little to deal with potential conflicts of interests despite “clear concerns” about Randox’s political connections, the cross-party committee of MPs found.
It added that officials were aware Paterson had been in direct contact with Matt Hancock, who was then the health secretary, while promoting Randox.
The MPs found that Randox made “substantial” profits after it was given the contracts to carry out Covid testing during the pandemic.
The firm’s profits in the year to June 2021 were “more than 100 times greater” than the previous year, according to the PAC, which questioned whether they were excessive.
In its latest accounts, Randox reported a profit of £177m for the year to 30 June 2021. The MPs said this compared with a profit of £1.2m that Randox reported for the 18 months up to 30 June 2020.
In case anybody has forgotten, Owen Paterson was the MP employed by Randox for £100k/year when Boris tried to change the rules to avoid him being sacked. I am confident that Boris, as far as he was aware, did not enjoy any monies or benefits by him or any of his ministers passed on being directly connected with this good fortune for Randox and believed that they were purely coincidental.
The Parliamentary Standards Commissioner report - said Paterson had "repeatedly used his privileged position to benefit two companies for whom he was a paid consultant, and that this has brought the house into disrepute" and that "no previous case of paid advocacy has seen so many breaches or such a clear pattern of behaviour in failing to separate private and public interests".
Small tip of the huge iceberg.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
Can't think what the problem may be, as today's story in the Guardian highlights.
UK health department played ‘fast and loose’ when awarding Covid contracts to Randox
Commons public accounts committee issues damning report into £777m of contracts given to firm that employed Owen Paterson as lobbyist
Ministers and government officials played “fast and loose” when awarding £777m in Covid contracts to a healthcare firm that employed the Conservative MP Owen Paterson as a lobbyist, the head of parliament’s spending watchdog has said.
In a damning report, the House of Commons public accounts committee (PAC) concluded that the government made a series of failures, making it impossible to know if the contracts had been awarded properly to Randox.
The Department of Health and Social Care did little to deal with potential conflicts of interests despite “clear concerns” about Randox’s political connections, the cross-party committee of MPs found.
It added that officials were aware Paterson had been in direct contact with Matt Hancock, who was then the health secretary, while promoting Randox.
The MPs found that Randox made “substantial” profits after it was given the contracts to carry out Covid testing during the pandemic.
The firm’s profits in the year to June 2021 were “more than 100 times greater” than the previous year, according to the PAC, which questioned whether they were excessive.
In its latest accounts, Randox reported a profit of £177m for the year to 30 June 2021. The MPs said this compared with a profit of £1.2m that Randox reported for the 18 months up to 30 June 2020.
In case anybody has forgotten, Owen Paterson was the MP employed by Randox for £100k/year when Boris tried to change the rules to avoid him being sacked. I am confident that Boris, as far as he was aware, did not enjoy any monies or benefits by him or any of his ministers passed on being directly connected with this good fortune for Randox and believed that they were purely coincidental.
The Parliamentary Standards Commissioner report - said Paterson had "repeatedly used his privileged position to benefit two companies for whom he was a paid consultant, and that this has brought the house into disrepute" and that "no previous case of paid advocacy has seen so many breaches or such a clear pattern of behaviour in failing to separate private and public interests".
Small tip of the huge iceberg.
The Public Accounts Committee have a reputation for being very direct and forthright - my Dad had a couple of minor brushes when he was up in Sunley Tower.
Without Paterson, or at least without the attempt to avoid his suspension, the avalanche that took Johnson down would at best have been delayed. As ever, the cover-up, not the act.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
As opposed to a parliamentary committee with him tied to a table with a circular saw heading towards his genitals
Johnson: "So, Mr Committee Member, do you expect me to talk?"
Committee Member in a resigned tone: "No, you fat bloater, we expect you to lie."