Saddleworth2
Well-Known Member
Moral turpitude.
Alexandole Boris de Pfeffel Johnson
- Thread starter hilts
- Start date
Rascal
El Presidente
OK I will bite,
Labour were, as I have posted many times before, but the staff at Labour party HQ were cunts and conspired against a Labour victory.
The cunts must be very proud of themselves now, I would try the cunts for manslaughter
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Can I ask how Johnson can state publicly and in a phone call with Rashford he said he only heard about the campaign today when yesterday number 10 issued a press release saying Johnson had ruled out free school meals would happen...???.......oh yeah I remember now ....he is a fucking liar
Indeed but it’s easier to blame others.
aguerrrroooooooooooo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Feb 2016
- Messages
- 11,040
I really liked Corbyn, didn't agree with all of his policies completely, but thought he brought some refreshing potential change to the table.
However it must be said that with the benefit of hindsight there was a lot he could have done to tackle the problems at the G.E. He needed stronger clearer messaging on brexit and really had to go hard on the alleged anti semitism criticism, ultimately labour failed in these two departments and that's why we have such a majority for the conservatives.
I really don't see how he could've done much worse than this shower though
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Remember the right wing gammon outrage about what they dubbed Blairforce One?
Rascal
El Presidente
Dictators love the trappings of power.
Not saying Johnson is a dictator, but I have that little trust in him it wouldn't surprise me if he became more authoritarian as he exists to be in power.
Not saying Johnson is a dictator, but I have that little trust in him it wouldn't surprise me if he became more authoritarian as he exists to be in power.
journolud
Well-Known Member
That’s what he has advisors and a team around him. It’s after the fact now and probably irrelevant but it is probably marginally less damaging for him to pretend not to have known about Rashford’s campaign than to be seen to do a u turn due to pressure from a popular sporting figure. Boris wants to be the nation’s sweetheart
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
What are you basing that opinion on?
Based on my understanding of the British people, there simply isn’t a sufficient body of people In the UK to elect a left-wing Prime Minister. It’s simple mathematics.
Easier target....
He’s the world’s worst dictator if he his, every decision he makes is based on public pressure.
It’s almost becoming a direct democracy.
And if he hadn’t he’d be criticised for not caring.
Some people will only stop moaning when they give the keys to Starmer and Starmer appoints Corbyn.
I'll be happy when he can get people's names right.
If you think the leaked report proves Labour would have won 80+ more seats then you’re too far gone in delusion.
Their Brexit strategy alone was the main issue on the doorstep, although Corbyn and the manifesto weren’t popular either.
The antisemitism was the biggest issue for me but it wasn’t the biggest issue for the electorate, that was the 2nd referendum.
It’s not really an issue is it? He doesn’t like football, oh dear!
I don't like him but I know his name. And he wasn't even the most talked about person in the country yesterday unlike Rashford. The man is an ignorant fuckwit.
Gareth Barry Conlon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2014
- Messages
- 15,930
There is a rule in most modern democracies that you don't use state assets as a backdrop or tool for your political campaigning.
You don’t like who but you know his name?
The Health Secretary, in the middle of a pandemic, you should know that?
I don’t know why Hancock getting Rashford’s name wrong is an issue at all, his campaign isn’t even Hancocks area and he doesn’t like football.