All he needs is 14 votes. If it's such an American idea, I would guess the Glazers, FSG, Shahid Khan, The 49ers (Leeds), Stan Kroenke, Tag Worldwide (Palace) and Wesley Edens (Villa) could all be persuaded given they're American and have seen it work.
So he's probably already got 8 votes already.
So you need 6 more. There's obviosly a group for whome this represents zero risk - Bournemouth, Brentford, Brighton, Forest etc. They're not going to lose players to an All Star but stand to make a lot of money.
Then there's the group of owners who just want to make money.
Oh I’m sure he could get the votes given the reality is this would only impact the top teams.
If you look at the Sky mock ups as an example of the potential North and South teams, the North was all City and Liverpool with two from United, and the South was mostly Chelsea, Arsenal and Tottenham with one from West Ham.
For the rest, it’s pretty much a free pass.
And given Liverpool, United, Chelsea and Arsenal are all US owned - and ENIC at Spurs might as well be - then I doubt he’d struggle for votes.
The problem I was highlighting was this would cost a fortune in a way it simply doesn’t in the US, as the League would have to negotiate with the individual clubs to release their players, as they wouldn’t be playing for their clubs anymore - which would not be easy.
Let’s look at City - who (based on the mock ups) would be required to release Ederson, Dias, Cancelo, de Bruyne, Rodri and Haaland. And that’s just for the starting 11.
Given the risk is all with City for those players, I’d imagine we’d be asking for a small fortune to release them. Replicate that across the rest of the top 6, and that’s a chunk of your profits eaten up already.
That problem simply doesn’t exist in the MLS, with central player contracting.
Then look at the lack of evidence of any market or appetite for watching a North/South team in comparison to the US.
The East and West split over there is fundamental to the MLS. The competition between the coasts is a real, established and marketable concept. Hence it can raise the kind of figures he’s talking about.
There’s nothing suggesting the same market exists over here, where the club’s links to their cities are way more ingrained.
So you’ve got much higher costs, and a much less established market. Therefore less profit for the League.
It works in the US because the League structure is completely different to the PL.
Putting aside all other arguments, purely from a commercial perspective - with our model over here, it’s a shit idea.