Another shooting in america

[buckshot]

The problem is that the NRA is completely irrational. If somebody says we should make 30 or 100 capacity magazines illegal they claim that the government is "comin' fer r gunzzzz". If they displayed even a little common sense we'd all be better off.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

They are statistically rare. I'm not even going to argue with you about this.

No, I wouldn't if I were you either.

7 mass shootings in America in 2012, with 140 casualties and 68 killed (not including the gun men) and 70 since 1982.

This year has seen a doubling on any previous year.

If you want to try and be an apologist for the NRA based on semantics then be my guest. You only make yourself look a fool.

Everyone looks like a fool in your eyes. That's your problem.

I don't.

 

[ElanJo]

No, I wouldn't if I were you either.

7 mass shootings in America in 2012, with 140 casualties and 68 killed (not including the gun men) and 70 since 1982.

This year has seen a doubling on any previous year.

If you want to try and be an apologist for the NRA based on semantics then be my guest. You only make yourself look a fool.

Everyone looks like a fool in your eyes. That's your problem.

No. Just the fools and it is their problem. I couldn't give a fuck as it doesn't affect me.

Nice change of discussion from your made up definitions though. Classic moving of goal posts. Good work.

What goal have I moved exactly?

Go and play with the creationists, you twonk.

 

[SWP's back]

Everyone looks like a fool in your eyes. That's your problem.

No. Just the fools and it is their problem. I couldn't give a fuck as it doesn't affect me.

Nice change of discussion from your made up definitions though. Classic moving of goal posts. Good work.

What goal have I moved exactly?

Go and play with the creationists, you twonk.

You moved away from the debate (within which you'd hit a dead end on account of being wrong) to pursue an argument against the poster rather than the point thicky.

Fairly straightforward even for a borderline rainman such as yourself.

Why not just admit your definition of rare is not one shared by the rest of the Enhlish speaking world rather than continue to dig an ever deepening hole.

 

[ElanJo]

No. Just the fools and it is their problem. I couldn't give a fuck as it doesn't affect me.

Nice change of discussion from your made up definitions though. Classic moving of goal posts. Good work.

What goal have I moved exactly?

Go and play with the creationists, you twonk.

You moved away from the debate (within which you'd hit a dead end on account of being wrong) to pursue an argument against the poster rather than the point thicky.

Fairly straightforward even for a borderline rainman such as yourself.

Why not just admit your definition of rare is not one shared by the rest of the Enhlish speaking world rather than continue to dig an ever deepening hole.

Ending the 'argument' is not moving the goalposts. Fuck me...

 

[SWP's back]

What goal have I moved exactly?

Go and play with the creationists, you twonk.

You moved away from the debate (within which you'd hit a dead end on account of being wrong) to pursue an argument against the poster rather than the point thicky.

Fairly straightforward even for a borderline rainman such as yourself.

Why not just admit your definition of rare is not one shared by the rest of the Enhlish speaking world rather than continue to dig an ever deepening hole.

Ending the 'argument' is not moving the goalposts. Fuck me...

I'd rather not.

 

[toby]

You moved away from the debate (within which you'd hit a dead end on account of being wrong) to pursue an argument against the poster rather than the point thicky.

Fairly straightforward even for a borderline rainman such as yourself.

Why not just admit your definition of rare is not one shared by the rest of the Enhlish speaking world rather than continue to dig an ever deepening hole.

Ending the 'argument' is not moving the goalposts. Fuck me...

I'd rather not.

Are you sure they reckon the ones that argue the most are sexually attracted to each other ;o)

 

[SWP's back]

Ending the 'argument' is not moving the goalposts. Fuck me...

I'd rather not.

Are you sure they reckon the ones that argue the most are sexually attracted to each other ;o)

I can't remember having argued with it before. But no, on this occasion I argue as people wanting guns to make up for their tiny penises is not worth the 30,000 killed per year in the States or the 68 killed in mass shootings this year

Now if you tell me elanojo is a size 6 with a d cup and 21 then I'd fuck it, until then it's simply a disagreement over his gun toting ways.

 

[ElanJo]

I might have a d cup but I'm definitely not size 6

 

[SWP's back]

I might have a d cup but I'm definitely not size 6

I will go to an 8 tops.