There should be no possibility at all of Tevez ever playing for City again. Some of the attempts to minimize what he did are pathetic.
What happened in Munich was perhaps foreshadowed in some respects by the article in last Sunday's
People, which claimed that "the Argentinian’s uneasy pact with boss Roberto Mancini is reaching meltdown":
http://www.people.co.uk/sport/footb...nt-with-manchester-ciy-again-102039-23444092/
At least one of this thread's posters seeking to obfuscate what Tevez did in Munich was one of those who described that article as a pack of lies (and who unforgivably insulted the intelligence of Bluemoon critics of Tevez by claiming that they were stooges of the media). It is interesting that various of the obfuscations have involved references to Modric, just as that article does.
*****
As an aside, BBC Sports writers seem to have been trawling around for people prepared to say that Tevez might be given another chance:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15106514.stm
What is particularly curious is that Alan Pardew is top of their list. When Pardew, then West Ham manager, substituted him, Tevez stormed out of the ground. Allegedly Tevez conspired to get Pardew sacked. In any event, after Pardew was sacked, Tevez issued this statement:
"I was surprised to see how long Pardew held on to the job in the end. In Argentina or Brazil he would have been out long ago. It was clear the team did not react as he wanted -- it wasn't going right. I was never given the chances I thought I would be given and I was told to play out of position against my will. I had to sacrifice myself for the team which I don't think helped. I was playing in ways I did not understand well and I lost a lot from my own game."
I am surprised that Pardew seemingly said nothing in support of Mancini in his Munich predicament.