And that will actually be the case forever unless we actually let him work and progress.
On a team that starts 1 striker, being the #3 Striker is not adequate. You either have gim as your 2 or loan him out if you are not sure.the #3 striker position are normally for old ex stars taking up a cheque in an emergency role. Not a developing talent.He will get plenty of time to work & progress under a proper manager, so long as he performs upto a decent standard. That doesn't mean we have to treat him as a no 1 or 2 striker. No 3 or 4 is quite adequate for a kid his age provided the manager is someone willing to use him & that he keeps his standards up.
Think you misunderstood my meaning of the comment on Nacho. He is a highly talented young man that we all see as being a future star. However if Kun is injured again and Bony is gone he is not ready for the responsibility that will be placed upon him as the No. 1 striker.And that will actually be the case forever unless we actually let him work and progress.
On a team that starts 1 striker, being the #3 Striker is not adequate. You either have gim as your 2 or loan him out if you are not sure.the #3 striker position are normally for old ex stars taking up a cheque in an emergency role. Not a developing talent.
That will always be the case unless we actually play him. Some have been touting Bellerin for our RB position, forgetting had he been here 2 years ago, he'd still be considered a highly talented youngster who can't shoulder being #1. Now most think he might be the #1 RB in the league period.Think you misunderstood my meaning of the comment on Nacho. He is a highly talented young man that we all see as being a future star. However if Kun is injured again and Bony is gone he is not ready for the responsibility that will be placed upon him as the No. 1 striker.
Our No. 1 usually plays around 40 -45 games a season so how many games would that leave for a third choice striker.#3 at City isn't a true #3 since our #1 is a bit of a crock. Sorry, but it has to be said.
Still is. Unless our #2 is also a crock. You want Nacho starting 25 to 30 games next season. Either he is good enough or he isn't. But making him the backup to the backup does him no good.#3 at City isn't a true #3 since our #1 is a bit of a crock. Sorry, but it has to be said.
Point I keep trying to make.Our No. 1 usually plays around 40 -45 games a season so how many games would that leave for a third choice striker.
I would rather Sergio starts every game next season with nacho coming on 20/30 mins from the end.Still is. Unless our #2 is also a crock. You want Nacho starting 25 to 30 games next season. Either he is good enough or he isn't. But making him the backup to the backup does him no good.
i know, I think people have it in their heads Aguero is much more injury prone than he is apart from 2 seasons ago he hasn't played less than 40 games including being rested for cup games and barring a disaster in the closing weeks will be just over 40 this season.Point I keep trying to make.