daztrueblue91
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 4,081
Firstly, I don't have any complaints about Pellegrini's team selection today. I personally would have started Sterling instead of Iheanacho just to counter Arsenal's width and let KDB play in the middle. However, with Kelechi's recent form he more than deserved his start.
The way we started was excellent. The first 8 minutes they could hardly get the ball out of their half and I thought the atmosphere was brilliant. There was a real positive vibe around the place and it really could have been the game to save our season. We took a deserved lead and looked like the City of old who could have gave them a hammering. Then came a moment that summed up Pellegrini's reign. All of that good work undone by Clichy trying to be too clever and then conceding from a basic set piece. 1-1 and the good start and atmosphere took a proper turn for the worse. There was a sense of foreseeing how the rest of the game would pan out and it's extremely difficult to stay positive when your side is more likely to gift the opposition a goal than score. It was also clear at this point that Arsenal were shell-shocked and decided to settle for a draw. The fact Cech was taking longer to take a goal kick than Tim Howard normally does sums up Arsenal's game plan.
Now to the part where Pellegrini fucked up. It was clear to me, and many sitting around me, that just after Iheanacho wasted a good counter attacking chance Arsenal was starting to overrun our midfield. They were keeping the ball around our box and had a few good chances, most notably the one where Walcott blitzed through our defence. That was the perfect time to introduce some extra legs in midfield. Delph and Toure were options from the bench who could have gave us more energy or control in the middle but for some crazy reason Pellegrini decided to keep it as it was.
I think it there was ever a game that could sum up a managers reign then today was it. We played some very good attacking football and relied on some moments of individual brilliance. We scored a few goals and had a calamitous defence who gifted the opposition goals. To top it off we refused to show any signs of pragmatism in a game which was vital in our quest to finish in the top 4.
If we would have won today then I believe that many of the fans in the stadium would have stayed and wished Pellegrini well. The mood would have been upbeat at we would be able to look back on a season where we have won a trophy, reached a CL semi final and qualified for the CL. However, it became a game where we pretty much gave up the chance, well at least it being in our own hands, of securing CL football for next season. It kind of sums up our entire process in that we finally reach the latter stages of the CL and show we can compete with the likes of PSG and Madrid and then fail to qualify. The phrase "one step forward and two steps back" perfectly sums up Pellegrini's reign here.
The way we started was excellent. The first 8 minutes they could hardly get the ball out of their half and I thought the atmosphere was brilliant. There was a real positive vibe around the place and it really could have been the game to save our season. We took a deserved lead and looked like the City of old who could have gave them a hammering. Then came a moment that summed up Pellegrini's reign. All of that good work undone by Clichy trying to be too clever and then conceding from a basic set piece. 1-1 and the good start and atmosphere took a proper turn for the worse. There was a sense of foreseeing how the rest of the game would pan out and it's extremely difficult to stay positive when your side is more likely to gift the opposition a goal than score. It was also clear at this point that Arsenal were shell-shocked and decided to settle for a draw. The fact Cech was taking longer to take a goal kick than Tim Howard normally does sums up Arsenal's game plan.
Now to the part where Pellegrini fucked up. It was clear to me, and many sitting around me, that just after Iheanacho wasted a good counter attacking chance Arsenal was starting to overrun our midfield. They were keeping the ball around our box and had a few good chances, most notably the one where Walcott blitzed through our defence. That was the perfect time to introduce some extra legs in midfield. Delph and Toure were options from the bench who could have gave us more energy or control in the middle but for some crazy reason Pellegrini decided to keep it as it was.
I think it there was ever a game that could sum up a managers reign then today was it. We played some very good attacking football and relied on some moments of individual brilliance. We scored a few goals and had a calamitous defence who gifted the opposition goals. To top it off we refused to show any signs of pragmatism in a game which was vital in our quest to finish in the top 4.
If we would have won today then I believe that many of the fans in the stadium would have stayed and wished Pellegrini well. The mood would have been upbeat at we would be able to look back on a season where we have won a trophy, reached a CL semi final and qualified for the CL. However, it became a game where we pretty much gave up the chance, well at least it being in our own hands, of securing CL football for next season. It kind of sums up our entire process in that we finally reach the latter stages of the CL and show we can compete with the likes of PSG and Madrid and then fail to qualify. The phrase "one step forward and two steps back" perfectly sums up Pellegrini's reign here.