Arsenal Thread 2013/14

[gooner2]

He a very charming man off the pitch when away from football but in interviews he holds a lot back to be fair in terms of his personality. i think after last few years very wary of media.

who gives a fuck if hes charming off pitch and away from football.. hes a c u n t on it..

to me he's like a stretch version of lester piggot.

Name me a great manager who is a good loser and who perfect human being. Jose and sir alex are the same. their winners and not always nice men on the touchline.

 

[samharris]

so in plain terms he is a miserable boring old deluded fucker......................and a loser.

Arsenal fans listen to the biased media tripe too often.

Wenger is just protecting his players, after getting hammered 6-3 the last thing you want to hear is that you cant compete with this team. I would expect every top manager to say what he said.

Oh perleaseeee, only a dick would say 'We gave them (City) 5 of the goals ! Moans that 3 offside decisions went against them, that we are no better than Everton and that they could have won that game.

A decent manager would make sensible comments, praise us and say that they will return next week, smarter, stronger better.

Id like to know excactly how they could have won that game.. we had 18 shots at goal only 6 went in..

so shut the fuck up Wengula..we could have put 18 past you if things had been different..


see what a c u n t I made of myself there.. thing is..Im happy to admit it..

 

[City_Sean]

Arsenal were certainly right when they said you Cant Buy Class,

Ozil was never worth 42.5 Million.

 

[gooner2]

Wenger is just protecting his players, after getting hammered 6-3 the last thing you want to hear is that you cant compete with this team. I would expect every top manager to say what he said.

Oh perleaseeee, only a dick would say 'We gave them (City) 5 of the goals ! Moans that 3 offside decisions went against them, that we are no better than Everton and that they could have won that game.

A decent manager would make sensible comments, praise us and say that they will return next week, smarter, stronger better.

Id like to know excactly how they could have won that game.. we had 18 shots at goal only 6 went in..

so shut the fuck up Wengula..we could have put 18 past you if things had been different..


see what a c u n t I made of myself there.. thing is..Im happy to admit it..

City deserved to win yesterday. Far the better team on saturday. we take it and move on.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Its amazing how Manchester city fans seem to hate arsenal but the feeling isnt reciprocated by gooners. City fans are seen as more deserved of their success because they suffered for so long, and city as a club are seen as a lesser of all the other evils. I guess this will change when city fans stop feeling lucky and start feeling entitled, which is whats happening now.
I remember going into a pub outside the emirates after we beat stoke 3-1 earlier this season, reason I went in was the loud cheers I was hearing, I see city 3 united 0 on the big screen and everyone dancing about in their arsenal shirts.
Maybe "hating" arsenal is what other big clubs do so this is just manchester city fans assuming their position to create a rivalry that doesnt really exist.
The other thing I find significant on the forum in general, is how manchester city fans are always looking for reactions to their wins, theyve just stuck 6 past us playing swashbuckling football and its as if they want validation from the press, wenger, arsenal fans. They need to understand that they will never get that, and they should not be looking for that. Just enjoy being the best and know that it irks everyone else. When we didnt lose a game all season the press were still having a go at us for not winning the treble. Other managers and other fans will never laud your achievements, but they all would love to swap teams with you. I know I would.

There was a common purpose between Arsenal and City fans for a number of years, most discernibly from 1996 to 2008, for reasons which I don't need to expand upon, which made the bile which was directed towards us from many Arsenal fans, following the takeover, particularly hard to take. I would say that Arsenal fans took our change in fortune as badly as any set of supporters, even united's - possibly because at the time, buoyed by so many years of almost unbridled success, and all too aware of City's previous hard-wiring to self-destruct, their supporters were cocooned from any sense of threat to their clubs enduring hegemony.

What especially stuck in the craw was the widespread suggestion from many of your supporters that we did not deserve this because our club somehow lacked "history" and this served to annoy for two reasons:

Firstly, because it shows a complete lack of understanding and respect for what was (and is) a leading English footballing institution. It may not have won as many trophies as Arsenal in recent years, but City's narrative, the real history of any football club, is as interesting as any other cub in the land. Anyone who fails to appreciate the currency of this doesn't really 'get' what it is to be a football supporter.

Secondly, because it was espoused by Arsenal fans who were ignorant, or willfully blind, to their own club's dubious past: buying their way into the First Division at the expense of Spurs; the highly questionable business practices of Henry Norris; George Graham's bungs; the Danny Fizman cash injection (aka: investment) in the 1990's; the naked self-greed of the club's central role at the vanguard of forming the TV deals in the late 80's and early 90's at others club's expense; as well as their wholly selfish membership of the G-14, are all examples which many of your supporters conspicuously avoid reconciling when talking about "earning" the right to sit at the top table. Possibly because they aren't aware of them. People pontificating about "history" really should do a bit more research on their chosen subject.

That is why you see so much vitriol directed towards so many of your supporters from City fans both on here and more generally.

No-one likes a hypocrite, especially one that turns on you when you have a bit of good fortune in life.

It does seem, after all, that you can buy class. Perhaps you should take that banner down, just like united did once we'd rammed it down their throats. That would show a bit of "class" hitherto all too sadly lacking from many people connected with your club.

 

[mancunial]

To get into bed with Trafford scum after all the shit storm going on between your clubs for over fifteen years amazed me, arsenal went lower than a rattlesnakes belly to have any connection with them, tell you now the scum look at you ( arsenal ) like your dog shit? You sold your integrity to try and stop city doing what you have been doing for decades.

 

[alan47]

The only time Man city will get praise from Arsene Wenger is in May if you win the league. Until then expect more dismissive talk.

 

[samharris]

Its amazing how Manchester city fans seem to hate arsenal but the feeling isnt reciprocated by gooners. City fans are seen as more deserved of their success because they suffered for so long, and city as a club are seen as a lesser of all the other evils. I guess this will change when city fans stop feeling lucky and start feeling entitled, which is whats happening now.
I remember going into a pub outside the emirates after we beat stoke 3-1 earlier this season, reason I went in was the loud cheers I was hearing, I see city 3 united 0 on the big screen and everyone dancing about in their arsenal shirts.
Maybe "hating" arsenal is what other big clubs do so this is just manchester city fans assuming their position to create a rivalry that doesnt really exist.
The other thing I find significant on the forum in general, is how manchester city fans are always looking for reactions to their wins, theyve just stuck 6 past us playing swashbuckling football and its as if they want validation from the press, wenger, arsenal fans. They need to understand that they will never get that, and they should not be looking for that. Just enjoy being the best and know that it irks everyone else. When we didnt lose a game all season the press were still having a go at us for not winning the treble. Other managers and other fans will never laud your achievements, but they all would love to swap teams with you. I know I would.

There was a common purpose between Arsenal and City fans for a number of years, most discernibly from 1996 to 2008, for reasons which I don't need to expand upon, which made the bile which was directed towards us from many Arsenal fans, following the takeover, particularly hard to take. I would say that Arsenal fans took our change in fortune as badly as any set of supporters, even united's - possibly because at the time, buoyed by so many years of almost unbridled success, and all too aware of City's previous hard-wiring to self-destruct, their supporters were cocooned from any sense of threat to their clubs enduring hegemony.

What especially stuck in the craw was the widespread suggestion from many of your supporters that we did not deserve this because our club somehow lacked "history" and this served to annoy for two reasons:

Firstly, because it shows a complete lack of understanding and respect for what was (and is) a leading English footballing institution. It may not have won as many trophies as Arsenal in recent years, but City's narrative, the real history of any football club, is as interesting as any other cub in the land. Anyone who fails to appreciate the currency of this doesn't really 'get' what it is to be a football supporter.

Secondly, because it was espoused by Arsenal fans who were ignorant, or willfully blind, to their own club's dubious past: buying their way into the First Division at the expense of Spurs; the highly questionable business practices of Henry Norris; George Graham's bungs; the Danny Fizman cash injection (aka: investment) in the 1990's; the naked self-greed of the club's central role at the vanguard of forming the TV deals in the late 80's and early 90's at others club's expense; as well as their wholly selfish membership of the G-14, are all examples which many of your supporters conspicuously avoid reconciling when talking about "earning" the right to sit at the top table. Possibly because they aren't aware of them. People pontificating about "history" really should do a bit more research on their chosen subject.

That is why you see so much vitriol directed towards so many of your supporters from City fans both on here and more generally.

No-one likes a hypocrite, especially one that turns on you when you have a bit of good fortune in life.

It does seem, after all, that you can buy class. Perhaps you should take that banner down, just like united did once we'd rammed it down their throats. That would show a bit of "class" hitherto all too sadly lacking from many people connected with your club.

Oh ffs.. was gonna post that too...thats the last time I pm you my ideas!!! ;)

 

[Paul Lake's Left Knee]

Its amazing how Manchester city fans seem to hate arsenal but the feeling isnt reciprocated by gooners. City fans are seen as more deserved of their success because they suffered for so long, and city as a club are seen as a lesser of all the other evils. I guess this will change when city fans stop feeling lucky and start feeling entitled, which is whats happening now.
I remember going into a pub outside the emirates after we beat stoke 3-1 earlier this season, reason I went in was the loud cheers I was hearing, I see city 3 united 0 on the big screen and everyone dancing about in their arsenal shirts.
Maybe "hating" arsenal is what other big clubs do so this is just manchester city fans assuming their position to create a rivalry that doesnt really exist.
The other thing I find significant on the forum in general, is how manchester city fans are always looking for reactions to their wins, theyve just stuck 6 past us playing swashbuckling football and its as if they want validation from the press, wenger, arsenal fans. They need to understand that they will never get that, and they should not be looking for that. Just enjoy being the best and know that it irks everyone else. When we didnt lose a game all season the press were still having a go at us for not winning the treble. Other managers and other fans will never laud your achievements, but they all would love to swap teams with you. I know I would.

There was a common purpose between Arsenal and City fans for a number of years, most discernibly from 1996 to 2008, for reasons which I don't need to expand upon, which made the bile which was directed towards us from many Arsenal fans, following the takeover, particularly hard to take. I would say that Arsenal fans took our change in fortune as badly as any set of supporters, even united's - possibly because at the time, buoyed by so many years of almost unbridled success, and all too aware of City's previous hard-wiring to self-destruct, their supporters were cocooned from any sense of threat to their clubs enduring hegemony.

What especially stuck in the craw was the widespread suggestion from many of your supporters that we did not deserve this because our club somehow lacked "history" and this served to annoy for two reasons:

Firstly, because it shows a complete lack of understanding and respect for what was (and is) a leading English footballing institution. It may not have won as many trophies as Arsenal in recent years, but City's narrative, the real history of any football club, is as interesting as any other cub in the land. Anyone who fails to appreciate the currency of this doesn't really 'get' what it is to be a football supporter.

Secondly, because it was espoused by Arsenal fans who were ignorant, or willfully blind, to their own club's dubious past: buying their way into the First Division at the expense of Spurs; the highly questionable business practices of Henry Norris; George Graham's bungs; the Danny Fizman cash injection (aka: investment) in the 1990's; the naked self-greed of the club's central role at the vanguard of forming the TV deals in the late 80's and early 90's at others club's expense; as well as their wholly selfish membership of the G-14, are all examples which many of your supporters conspicuously avoid reconciling when talking about "earning" the right to sit at the top table. Possibly because they aren't aware of them. People pontificating about "history" really should do a bit more research on their chosen subject.

That is why you see so much vitriol directed towards so many of your supporters from City fans both on here and more generally.

No-one likes a hypocrite, especially one that turns on you when you have a bit of good fortune in life.

It does seem, after all, that you can buy class. Perhaps you should take that banner down, just like united did once we'd rammed it down their throats. That would show a bit of "class" hitherto all too sadly lacking from many people connected with your club.

Oh ffs.. was gonna post that too...thats the last time I pm you my ideas!!! ;)

He's a **** for that, i once mailed him that i was going to act all posh on the forum for shits and giggles, next thing i know, he's suddenly from Cheshire and has a butler.

 

[Bluemoon115]

The only time Man city will get praise from Arsene Wenger is in May if you win the league. Until then expect more dismissive talk.

Doesn't matter. By then you'll be scraping 4th place again.