Aston Villa (H) Post-Match Thread

[vincent]

Most of them had left with 10 minutes to go.

we had the usual WWUWYWS... made me smile as I clearly remember Villa Park being empty when they were last relegated.

 

[sir baconface]

You jest, but it’s only a matter of time before every other club inevitably copies us (again) and start fielding teams consisting almost entirely of midfielders.

Pep changes football again. ;-)

Ah, then we snap up a couple of big fcuk off bastard CBs for two and a quarter groats.

Like I said, it’s a cunning plan ;)

 

[balotellishaircut]

we had the usual WWUWYWS... made me smile as I clearly remember Villa Park being empty when they were last relegated.

Gobshite fans and Neanderthal manager, it's a long season and I can see them going down.

 

[oakiecokie]

Which means we got a VAR decision in our favour...

How can people struggle with this?

Sterling was onside when KDB kicked it so if it is his goal, everything is kosher.

Sterling was offside when Silva touched it so it should have been ruled out.

So we got a decision in our favour.

I’ve said nothing about the merits of VAR
You claimed it would have been offside for Sterling had Silva touched
Well he did and the PL do NOT agree with your claim ref the offside irrespective of what VAR thought

 

[SebastianBlue]

Ah, then we snap up a couple of big fcuk off bastard CBs for two and a quarter groats.

Like I said, master plan ;)

Nah, Pep will just bring back Dzeko and play him in the middle of a back three with Walker and Rodri on either side of him.

 

[oakiecokie]

So who is right ? The FA ? VAR? Referee? Or Silva ?

The one you missed. The PL.

 

[manimanc]

we had the usual WWUWYWS... made me smile as I clearly remember Villa Park being empty when they were last relegated.

And In the championship. Obviously their gloryhunters have come out of the woodwork this season. Wankers.

 

[domalino]

I’ve said nothing about the merits of VAR
You claimed it would have been offside for Sterling had Silva touched
Well he did and the PL do NOT agree with your claim ref the offside irrespective of what VAR thought

No. The PL have already released a statement that the goal was given because the VAR decided it didnt touch Silva.

 

[sir baconface]

BT a joke now talking about the second goal for over 5 minutes and saying it should be disallowed. If there is a touch by Silva, it is barely visible and certainly not conclusive and hardly affected the outcome of the ball travelling into the net. In the spirit of the game a perfectly good goal. It did not affect the result either.

So please Jake Humphreys give it a rest.

When he’s finished with City through the microscope he should smear some grey matter on the slide and look hard for any sign of intelligence.

 

[Ban-jani]

Anyone got a link to the VAR decision?

Not seen it since as I was there.