Aston Villa (H) Post-Match Thread

[Tricky_Trev]

So why has David Silva been credited with the goal ?
You claimed had he touched the ball Sterling would have been offside.Stop trying to divert a giant fucking cock up by you in your claims into something you`re trying to worm yourself out of.
Never wrong are you ?
The fountain of all football knowledge in the universe.Or so you think.

VAR was literally just Jon Moss sat in a room with a load of monitors. He doesn’t have the deciding say on who actually scored, and is quite capable of getting it wrong and being corrected later by the dubious goals panel who DO have the final say.

 

[SebastianBlue]

Is the correct answer but also the PL have given it to Merlin speaks volumes ... Sterling not offside

I am just waiting for Harry Kane to claim it.

 

[Tommy_Catons_Perm]

I’ve said nothing about the merits of VAR
You claimed it would have been offside for Sterling had Silva touched
Well he did and the PL do NOT agree with your claim ref the offside irrespective of what VAR thought

The BT premise, which was presented as fact, was that sterling was interfering IF Silva touched ball and was off side. At no point was it suggested that sterling was not interfering or that it may be subjective if he was interfering.

Reasons to allow goal......
1. Silva did not touch ball. So sterling not offside. Goal
2. Silva did touch ball. Sterling not interfering. Goal.

Less evidence to disallow it than allow it I think.

 

[sir baconface]

Is the correct answer but also the PL have given it to Merlin speaks volumes ... Sterling not offside

It’s as @domalino has said, mate. VAR decided Merlin didn’t touch it. Apparently it might otherwise have been judged offside.

The Dubious Goals Panel decided he did touch it and have credited the goal to Dave.

The two bodies are unrelated so the two potentially conflicting verdicts both stand.

 

[@BluePhil8]

Loved the 5 minute forensic review whilst they tried to rule out the 2nd, get fucked cu n ts.

 

[Blu1]

Odd game, odd atmosphere, Sterling is becoming incredible & so impressed with cancello or however you spell it. Great to see Foden again who is looking very sharp.

3 points & pressure back on Liverpool,
oh & fuk VAR

 

[oakiecokie]

You are really struggling here arent you?

VAR decided that Silva didnt touch it and said that's why they gave the goal.

The dubious goals panel who are completely unrelated to VAR, said they have decided Silva did touch it.

This isn't complicated.

It’s only complicated as you said differently.That fucking hole is getting bigger by the minute
Just admit you got it wrong
It’s NOT complicated but you keep trying to

You are really struggling here arent you?

VAR decided that Silva didnt touch it and said that's why they gave the goal.

The dubious goals panel who are completely unrelated to VAR, said they have decided Silva did touch it.



This isn't complicated.

have you actually seen the news ??
It’s been given to Silva you’re the one who keeps harking on about Sterling and KDB

 

[Dazzle84]

Poor Fern,

Hes been done twice in two games now

CL Atalanta, Ref gave a penalty against him after forward literally kicks ball towards centre spot whilst running in completely opposite direction into Fern

Villa today, forward just kicks ball to his left & then just runs in opposite direction to run into Fern then fall down after he initiates contact, 2nd yellow/red

Do you honestly believe the Atalanta one wasn't a foul??

 

[domalino]

It’s only complicated as you said differently.That fucking hole is getting bigger by the minute
Just admit you got it wrong
It’s NOT complicated but you keep trying to

have you actually seen the news ??
It’s been given to Silva you’re the one who keeps harking on about Sterling and KDB

I have said the same thing repeatedly. You're the one who is struggling.

 

[OntarioBlue]

The BT premise, which was presented as fact, was that sterling was offside and interfering with play, thus if Silva touched the ball then goal was disallowed. At no point was it suggested that sterling was not interfering or that it may be subjective if he was interfering.

Reasons to allow goal......
1. Silva did not touch ball. So sterling not offside. Goal
2. Silva did touch ball. Sterling not interfering. Goal.

Less evidence to disallow it than allow it I think.

The thing I didn’t understand at the time, and still don’t, is that if Sterling was offside and interfering with play, it didn’t matter if Dave touched it or not. He would have been interfering with Kevs’s shot with or without a Dave touch.

I wonder if the conclusion of the VAR ref was that he was offside but not interfering with play and the long review was to determine if Raz touched the ball because he was very close to it.