The thing I didn’t understand at the time, and still don’t, is that if Sterling was offside and interfering with play, it didn’t matter if Dave touched it or not. He would have been interfering with Kevs’s shot with or without a Dave touch.
I wonder if the conclusion of the VAR ref was that he was offside but not interfering with play and the long review was to determine if Raz touched the ball because he was very close to it.
Common sense from someone who can see what happened.. But even in real time I thought Sterling standing in front of the keeper had to be blocking his view of the ball, so no goal.