stan horne said:it depends on which tv angle you look at. for me if we're going to have a trial by camera angle then lets have it for all game defining moments like 2 footed tackles (or not) penalties not given ( raining to heavy at stamford bridge for the ref to see) or offside decisions (@ the stadium of light) either accept the referee's decision or let him use the technology the so called experts re-wind and re-wind until they've decided which way a throw in should be
Dr Mick said:rickmcfc said:Dr Mick said:I've seen this incident now loads of time and from lots of different angles. I've played it in slow mo, frame by frame x2 speed, x8 speed and even x30 speed. I've watched it with both eyes open, one eye closed, Squinting like i'm having a shit and wide eyed Garth Crooks doing an impression of a bulfrog. I've tried watching in a crowded Essex pub like a ManU fan who couldn't get a ticket and i've even tried watching it with my head up my arse like a typical Spuds fan.
And I have to say I can't see any stamp.
Has anyone thought to check Parkers head this morning for evidence of a stamp. Surely photo's would be all over the media by now it there had been any proof.
Well look a bit harder then as its clearly there. Oh, and take those blue tinted specs off, that may help as well.
Please show me evidence to prove there was a stamp on Parkers head. Surely if Mario had stamped Parker on the head as some people are claiming then there would be marks to his head and/or face. Twitcher even refered to stitches. If there were evidence then it would be all over the media by now such is the media witch hunt against Mario. All i am asking for is evidence. Once i've seen the photo then i'll concede that Parker had his head stamped on.
taconinja said:Actually, you can easily do permanent damage--even kill a man--doing what Huddlestone did.spurspinter1 said:whicko said:He thinks it's wrong, but he didn't think it was that wrong when Tom Huddlestone stamped on Bolton's Johan Elmander a couple of seasons ago, and escaped an FA charge. Two days later Redknapp was claiming he hadn't seen it – five minutes after the Balotelli incident he had seen it from all angles!
Was there for that one, it's been mentioned that Hudd had developed a bit of a nasty streak, that was on Elmander's midrift wasn't it? If hudd did do it on purpose then yeah, that is disgraceful but stamping down on someone's head is a much more serious action, he could have done some permanent damage to Parker, I think Mario would have lost his lovable eccentric persona if that was the case.
As for the harry not seeing the huddlestone incident, it does annoy me. Platt did exactly the same thing, burying your head in the sand makes it a hell of a lot easier, which is why any post match interview should include the key incidents being played to the manager/assistant manager during the interview.
spurspinter1 said:taconinja said:Actually, you can easily do permanent damage--even kill a man--doing what Huddlestone did.spurspinter1 said:Was there for that one, it's been mentioned that Hudd had developed a bit of a nasty streak, that was on Elmander's midrift wasn't it? If hudd did do it on purpose then yeah, that is disgraceful but stamping down on someone's head is a much more serious action, he could have done some permanent damage to Parker, I think Mario would have lost his lovable eccentric persona if that was the case.
As for the harry not seeing the huddlestone incident, it does annoy me. Platt did exactly the same thing, burying your head in the sand makes it a hell of a lot easier, which is why any post match interview should include the key incidents being played to the manager/assistant manager during the interview.
Found a video of the incident, yeah it's pretty bad. No one wants to see that and it should have got a ban of course.
I'm not blessed with knowlege of sporting injuries but I'd still go with my original thought that it is much easier to cause severe damage to the head with a stamping motion than the chest but it doesn't really mean much I guess. At least Huddlestone didn't go on to score the winning goal in that game, I think that is why Mario's has been in the medias eye more so, because it was such an important game.
It's kind of sad seeing the comments like "haha lolz look at the spudz crying lolz" etc I can only assume those posters have been on holiday or without internet at the time of some of your game changing refereeing decisions, because it has been a fucking war zone on here in those times, it has been said by members on this board and as mainly an observer I can say it has occasionally got to RAWK levels of self pity and tin hat agendas.
spurspinter1 said:taconinja said:Actually, you can easily do permanent damage--even kill a man--doing what Huddlestone did.spurspinter1 said:Was there for that one, it's been mentioned that Hudd had developed a bit of a nasty streak, that was on Elmander's midrift wasn't it? If hudd did do it on purpose then yeah, that is disgraceful but stamping down on someone's head is a much more serious action, he could have done some permanent damage to Parker, I think Mario would have lost his lovable eccentric persona if that was the case.
As for the harry not seeing the huddlestone incident, it does annoy me. Platt did exactly the same thing, burying your head in the sand makes it a hell of a lot easier, which is why any post match interview should include the key incidents being played to the manager/assistant manager during the interview.
Found a video of the incident, yeah it's pretty bad. No one wants to see that and it should have got a ban of course.
I'm not blessed with knowlege of sporting injuries but I'd still go with my original thought that it is much easier to cause severe damage to the head with a stamping motion than the chest but it doesn't really mean much I guess. At least Huddlestone didn't go on to score the winning goal in that game, I think that is why Mario's has been in the medias eye more so, because it was such an important game.
It's kind of sad seeing the comments like "haha lolz look at the spudz crying lolz" etc I can only assume those posters have been on holiday or without internet at the time of some of your game changing refereeing decisions, because it has been a fucking war zone on here in those times, it has been said by members on this board and as mainly an observer I can say it has occasionally got to RAWK levels of self pity and tin hat agendas.
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:Thanks for the 3pts ...now fuck off.
He's too busy trying to drag Rooney out of a brass house.LoveCity said:What the fook are the FA doing? It's 6pm, is Baconface too drunk to submit his verdict?