Balotelli alleged "stamp" V Spurs

double standards by the FA. Gerrard not charged for this <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJyOqJ5VLvA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJyOqJ5VLvA</a>.
Sorry dont know how to post videos
 
Tuesday 24 January 2012 @kickingsport
Mario Balotelli angered by ‘deliberate’ Redknapp tax evasion

Manchester City’s Mario Balotelli has reacted furiously after Harry Redknapp stole the attention of the world of football away from him for all of five minutes last night.

Details of Redknapp’s despicable tax evasion attempts through foreign bank accounts meant Balotelli was not the centre of controversy until news broke moments later of him being charged for stamping on Scott Parker.

Balotelli said, “Once could have been an accident, but you can see he’s been cooking his own books for years.”

“The bank account was in the name of his dog and used his date of birth.”

“Jesus Christ. Come on Harry.”

Redknapp tax evasion

“I’m usually the last person to talk about people doing stupid stuff, but this is so blatant – he’s trying to steal the spotlight away from me and I want to see him brought to justice,” Balotelli continued.

“It’s not the first time he’s done it and I’m sure it won’t be the last.”

“He did manage to sell Peter Crouch at a profit though, so fair play to him there – no wonder the chairman wanted to give him a bung or two.”

The Italian has until 1800 GMT on Wednesday to do something even more newsworthy before getting banned by the FA.
 
Do not believe for one second it was on purpose. Look at his left foot, he stands on Parkers hand, he then thrusts his left foot forward to lift his foot off his hand, the natural reaction to counter balance is to compensate with your right leg backwards. Don't buy into it. The FA obviously doesn't want a runaway league with the top two, so this will help them keep things tighter.

how can he purposefully stamp with his other foot completely off the ground?!
 
Is Balotelli the Victim?

1417a86.jpg


All we heard is Baloteli's unnatural off-balance 'backheel' and his alledgedly stamping and not paying careful attention to Parker's behaviour when he is lying on the turf

We assume that the canker prick Parker was an INNOCENT victim.

Now pay careful attention to the pic above.

Besides Modric shoving Mario aside what's unnatural about Parker is that he was crawling forward on his hands another couple of paces instead of cowering or protecting himself with both hands.

Was Parker seeking a contact? Judged it for yourself.

Parker IMO is a provacateur! Thats an understatement.
 
Re: Is Balotelli the Victim?

blueprint said:
All we heard is Baloteli's unnatural off-balance 'backheel' and his alledgedly stamping and not paying careful attention to Parker's behaviour when he is lying on the turf

We assume that the canker prick Parker was an INNOCENT victim.

Now pay careful attention to the pic above.

Besides Modric shoving Mario aside what's unnatural about Parker is that he was crawling forward on his hands another couple of paces instead of cowering or protecting himself with both hands.

Was Parker seeking a contact? Judged it for yourself.

Parker IMO is a provacateur! Thats an understatement.
Good point. If you look really carefully you can see that Parker has attached an invisible piece of rope to Mario's ankle and pulls it towards him as Mario tries to get his leg out of the way.

FFS this is embarrassing. The guy stamped on Parker. Accept it and get over it.
 
Re: Is Balotelli the Victim?

blueprint said:

Besides [b]Modric shoving Mario aside [/b]what's unnatural about Parker is [size=5][b]that he was crawling forward on his hands another couple of paces [/b][/size]instead of [size=5][b]cowering or protecting himself with both hands[/b][/size].

Was Parker seeking a contact? Judged it for yourself.

Parker IMO is a provacateur! Thats an understatement.[/quote]

Thought this at the time, reckless play from Modric, could have done some serious damage. Straight yellow card in my books.

And your completely right about Parker, headbutting Mario's boot, why always him eh?
 
Re: Is Balotelli the Victim?

spurspinter1 said:
blueprint said:

Besides [b]Modric shoving Mario aside [/b]what's unnatural about Parker is [size=5][b]that he was crawling forward on his hands another couple of paces [/b][/size]instead of [size=5][b]cowering or protecting himself with both hands[/b][/size].

Was Parker seeking a contact? Judged it for yourself.

Parker IMO is a provacateur! Thats an understatement.[/quote]

Thought this at the time, reckless play from Modric, could have done some serious damage. Straight yellow card in my books.

And your completely right about Parker, headbutting Mario's boot, why always him eh?[/quote]

Thanks for the input and the 6 points. Nothing like racking up 500 posts on a City forum in 6 months eh?
 
Re: Is Balotelli the Victim?

blueprint said:
1417a86.jpg


All we heard is Baloteli's unnatural off-balance 'backheel' and his alledgedly stamping and not paying careful attention to Parker's behaviour when he is lying on the turf

We assume that the canker prick Parker was an INNOCENT victim.

Now pay careful attention to the pic above.

Besides Modric shoving Mario aside what's unnatural about Parker is that he was crawling forward on his hands another couple of paces instead of cowering or protecting himself with both hands.

Was Parker seeking a contact? Judged it for yourself.

Parker IMO is a provacateur! Thats an understatement.


As I commented before now I'm convinced that Mario is the VICTIM of a SANDWICH PLAY (Modric toppling & Parking bowling). It would have been if not for Mario's athletic ability to ward it off with with his backhell which a lot of Mario's detractors are nefariously attacking him (judge, jury & executioner) for stamping Parker.

Look Mario's peers (first witnesses) perceptions on the field are very important. They recognized a classical double play thats why they did not or were not in uproar over Mario's stumbling.

Its only when a video snippet and zoning in on Mario's backheel was replayed that Mario is targeted for stamping.

A CONVENIENT LIE to drive out Mario from City & the PL which genuinely needs an enigmatic super hero.

He is a top drawer if he were to go to another league. The league should not cut its nose to spite its face.

BTW its been quoted that foreign commentators of the match did not in any way shape or form saw any violent conduct on Mario's part. And that Parker should have been send off if the referee has been consistent (given the yellow card for Mario's innocuous foul).

It is alledgedly said our British football commentators throughout the match broadcasts were anti-City in their broadsides.
Is it any wonder then that they are accusing our Mario by pinpointing his backheel as stamping!

How we handled Mario's charge will shape the IMAGE of British Football & the FA.
Given that we are selectiviely not banning (Rooney, Crouch, Lampard, Terry et al) or having a trial by media.

It will be sheer height of HYPOCRISY if this perception remains.

Its about time British Justice & Fairness Prevails!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.