mick10 said:
And wrong why? Because you said so? By all means have an opinion but really? To come on and actually say yes to the high opinion thing and if you agree to that the arrogance also. Unreal. I bet everyone loves you in work!
If a group of people told me a cat was a dog and I disputed that claim I wouldn't be arrogant to do so, I would be correct. We had an OK game, actually a pretty decent one, but as I said in my original post, I don't think it was a really good one. A really good one wouldn't have seen the numerous tactical issues we saw in the first half. It seems to me, from some of the reactions on here, that people can't see the difference between 'not really good' and 'not good, really'.