ilovefotball
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2011
- Messages
- 45
I don't get why some City fans are saying Messi was the only difference and that the refree cost them the tie.
The result is 4-1 and Barca were denied two perfectly scored goals. How anyone can argue this by saying Messi was the only difference and the refree cost City the game needs to check their head. If anything, the refree gave City chance to come back, if the penalty was given and the goal stood, Barca would have gone to half time with 4-0 aggregate.
Stop arguing about the refree and focus on your own team. May be your team is not as good as Sky want you to believe? May be there are many medicore players in your team?
City is looking more and more like Chelsea and Mourinho these days.
God help you!
The result is 4-1 and Barca were denied two perfectly scored goals. How anyone can argue this by saying Messi was the only difference and the refree cost City the game needs to check their head. If anything, the refree gave City chance to come back, if the penalty was given and the goal stood, Barca would have gone to half time with 4-0 aggregate.
Stop arguing about the refree and focus on your own team. May be your team is not as good as Sky want you to believe? May be there are many medicore players in your team?
City is looking more and more like Chelsea and Mourinho these days.
God help you!