Benjamin Mendy - City lose case and Mendy awarded £11m in back pay (p168)

I don't like praising Ferguson, but one thing he always wanted was for his players to be settled and married as soon as possible. I think he thought it to be a way of preventing players acting the dickhead. Obviously it's not 100% perfect, but there's some positives to that approach.

However, a negative we've seen at City is that wives seem to want to live somewhere warmer/nicer than Manchester..!

Most of his teams were built around a British core including academy lads, who sometimes had already shacked up with childhood sweethearts.

Although that didn't really stop what appeared to be deluded entitlement and disrespect in the case of their own player who was charged with rape.
 
Last edited:
A prediction:

Mendy's lawyers will talk to City's lawyers.

Former will claim he's entitled to all earnings. Latter will claim his own actions (particularly breaching bail conditions to get banged up) mean he isn't entitled to anything. They'll split the difference because neither side wants this to get anywhere near court.

Which probably is about fair as whilst he was found not guilty of a criminal offence, his actions made him unavailable.
There is another scenario.
City and Mendy have already sorted everything out but he does not want to be declared bankrupt. For that reason his solicitor/ barrister at the Bankruptcy hearing made it all up to gain more time for his client.
In a few weeks/ months the Inland Revenue get their money and no one hears about it again.
 
Employment Law is similar to civil law where the burden of guilt is built around the balance of probabilities. I am sure that by his actions, guilty or not he brought the name of the club into disrepute which on it's own would be enough for any company to dismiss him. By being in the position he was in there was not a chance he would be able to play football for us so he would have frustrated his contract ( Frustrated contract .When an unforeseen event renders performance of a contract impossible or radically different from that originally contemplated by the parties. All future obligations of the parties to the contract are discharged) I don't think he would get far at an industrial tribunal
 
Yeah, but there's a lot of due diligence that goes on around players nowadays. It's not just footballing stuff, but also their attitude. However, ultimately, I don't think football teams give a shit about player's attitudes to women, they're more interested in their attitude to training and around the dressing room. You're signing boys and men in their late teens and early 20s. If you had to rule out anyone who was a bit of a pervert, there wouldn't be many left.
Is being a bit of a pervert similar to a bit pregnant? People’s private life’s don’t define them but there’s a line that shouldn’t be crossed.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.