Bruno Guimaraes
- Thread starter Nethermoor
- Start date
David Silva
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 978
Yeah if they’re happy enough with a loan why not go for it?
Some game time could help him kick on as Palmer did. Just as long as we don’t sell him.
Jonas.shaffer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Mar 2024
- Messages
- 1,238
- Team supported
- CITY
Savio should be the one going on loan, if anyone. Bobb is the better player, in my opinion.
£95m + Philips and a letter of apology : )85m + Philips
Legal Alien
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2021
- Messages
- 3,451
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Why do we have to send anyone out?
It's going to be a long season and we will need all these players to contribute.
All the young players will benefit from learning under Pep.
ninjamonkey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 18,038
Bobb on loan to Newcastle doesn't really make much sense to us or him though, they've got Gordon and Barnes as their main wingers, behind them, the quality is pretty shit but they're not short on numbers with almiron, fraser, murphy and others who they'll likely favour due to them owning those players.
surely if we were to loan him out we would want to send him somewhere he will be a mainstay of the side otherwise he can play a squad role here. If it's a deal breaker, it's worth the sacrifice otherwise it doesn't really fit.
surely if we were to loan him out we would want to send him somewhere he will be a mainstay of the side otherwise he can play a squad role here. If it's a deal breaker, it's worth the sacrifice otherwise it doesn't really fit.
Legal Alien
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2021
- Messages
- 3,451
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I just don't see why we're worried about the fee. He's an establised PL midfielder and the market has already been set for this type of player.
No-one gave a shit when clubs spent £105 & £115mill on Rice, Fernandez and Caceido respectively, last summer and Guimaraes isn't worse than any of those.
If we want him, and for me he's exactly what we need, just pay the money!
No-one gave a shit when clubs spent £105 & £115mill on Rice, Fernandez and Caceido respectively, last summer and Guimaraes isn't worse than any of those.
If we want him, and for me he's exactly what we need, just pay the money!
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,348
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I suspect that unlike the fees paid by Chelsea and Arsenal, City don't think he is worth the reported £100 million release clause amount and consider his value at £85 million ?
We seem to be consistent in not overpaying where we believe it to be the case.
And maybe the hierarchy aren't really arsed, but our pathetic arselicking media whores just love to report anything which they consider to be a negative for the club !
Legal Alien
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2021
- Messages
- 3,451
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I personally think we don't want to be seen to pay £100mill again.
But as i said though, the market has already been set and if we want players who make our team/squad better then we need to accept that's what we'll have to pay for that level of player.
He was underwhelming in the Copa America and his age profile is not what we really pay over the odds for; but if Bruno G can take the strain off Rodri then bring him in. Forget swapping Kalvin Phillips the only long shot is Cancelo but he may be on too much money for Newcastle and would probably not fancy the move North-east.
Last edited: