Newcastle can still throw the bid out and renew. One more season at Newcastle and then move on......No, they can't. That is the point of a release clause. Kane didn't have a release clause.
Newcastle can still throw the bid out and renew. One more season at Newcastle and then move on......No, they can't. That is the point of a release clause. Kane didn't have a release clause.
Gvardiol had a release clause......No they can't if he has a release clause. We are simply responsible for making the payment to Newcastle that the contract stipulates. There is contract law that clubs have to follow here. They can't just do whatever they feel like. If he doesn't have a release clause then it is a different matter.
No, they can't. They can try and persuade the player not to go but they cannot stop him from leaving if the buying club matches the release clause and the player wants to go.Newcastle can still throw the bid out an renew.
They still can and let him rot for 12 months. Besides that there is no clear evidence he does want toNo, they can't. They can try and persuade the player not to go but they cannot stop him from leaving if the buying club matches the release clause and the player wants to go.
No, they can't. What do you think a release clause is? And why do you think players have them in their contracts?They still can and let him rot for 12 months. Besides that there is no clear evidence he does want to
I don't believe he did. Haaland didGvardiol had a release clause......
Release clauses mean diddly squat.No, they can't. What do you think a release clause is? And why do you think players have them in their contracts?
They really don't. I guess you haven't a clue how they work.Release clauses mean diddly squat.
lolRelease clauses mean diddly squat.
I think he did but it didn't kick in until this Summer so we had to negotiate a fee with Leipzig, Haaland definitely did and we used that, as we did with Grealish.I don't believe he did. Haaland did