Bruno Guimaraes

[RayCTID]

I don't believe he did. Haaland did

Had one for this summer. Still had to negotiate to sign him for 2023-24

 

[RayCTID]

They really don't. I guess you haven't a clue how they work.

I do but they aren't as simple as you are make them out as.

 

[KingGeorge]

Had one for this summer. Still had to negotiate to sign him of 2023-24

Yeah we had to negotiate because the release clause wasn't active yet. If Bruno has an active one for this summer we don't need to negotiate anything with Newcastle we just need Bruno to agree to come.

 

[PragueBlue]

Had one for this summer. Still had to negotiate to sign him of 2023-24

Yes because we didn't want to wait for the RC to kick in and we wanted to negotiate a lower fee than the RC.

 

[PragueBlue]

I do but they aren't as simple as you are make them out as.

They really are that simple.

 

[RayCTID]

Yes because we didn't want to wait for the RC to kick in and we wanted to negotiate a lower fee than the RC.

Again we Bruno G isn't a must have signing.....

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

Release clause mean very little if the selling club completely ignores said clause. Harry Kane was on up until Spurs completely dissmissed the sale.

Kane didn't have a release clause.

Isn't it strange how many players with release clause's City have signed over the years. Yet apparently you believe they don't mean anything.

 

[PragueBlue]

Again we Bruno G isn't a must have signing.....

I have no idea if we want him (and definitely no idea if we would be willing to pay the amount required by his release clause) or if he wants us.

 

[RayCTID]

They really are that simple.

Nope

 

[RayCTID]

Kane didn't have a release clause.

Isn't it strange how many players with release clause's City have signed over the years. Yet apparently you believe they don't mean anything.

Not many Premier League club ones....Grealish took its time.