Regrettably, most of this thread has been a predictable read. Some 'white men' banging on about apocryphal tales of 'no go areas', 'racism works both ways' and so on, ad nauseum. All that's missing is the 'positive discrimination' line.
If someone is offended by a remark, then it's offensive. What is difficult to understand about this concept?
The other argument seems to be regarding privacy. Again, why is it that some people seem to think it acceptable to call people moronic names and refer to sweeping generalisations as long as the potentially offended parties are not present? Which is worse, the offensiveness or the dishonesty? I honestly like everyone unless an issue arises between us personally. Religion, politics and, yes, football teams are different issues to consider, and we all have our bias in such matters.
I don't recognise this 'us and them' country that some of you refer to but that may be a reflection on how you live your lives rather than how everyone else lives. And, yes, EVEN black people, individually and as various forms of 'collectives' can behave as appallingly as the rest of us. So what? As far as I am aware, most of the crime committed in the UK is by 'white people'. That doesn't make all 'white people' criminals, does it?
Anyway, congratulations to some of the posters who seem to have understood the debate better than me. The only thing that amazes me is that a privileged, educated woman doesn't deem it necessary to apologise for the offense caused when, I far as I can gather, there were black/brown people in earshot when she said it. Freedom = Responsiblity. Only the oppressed have no choice. Be thankful that you do.