malg
Well-Known Member
Bullshit decision. Independent panel my arse.
Vienna_70 said:The cookie monster said:Isn't it an independent panel and not the F A who made the decisionMarkt85 said:And it also sends a clear message to young kids that if someone brushes your hair your entitled to con the ref and hold your face in extreme agony.
It was a tussle and a yellow at worst,
The Swansea manager even admitted it wasn't a red.
The FA have to be seen to back there man Webb and were never going to show some balls and punish the real cheat, Chico Flores.
Joke decision
Your right though Flores should be punished.
I also think Flores should be punished, just like that - was it Watford? - player at Etihad recently. He was lying on the ground as if he'd been pole-axed, but as soon as the ref told him to get up, he was running around like a Spring lamb.
It deserved a booking at least.
Spot on mate. He was lucky to be on the pitch before that tooblue b4 the moon said:Crouchinho said:Correct decision. Well done FA
We've had players banned for a foot flick in the past think it was Petrov against Everton. So bollocks to the he didn't catch him hard. He swung his arm.
Flores rolling around is another issue.
Bottom line is if Carroll was not English or with City we'd hear none of this poor Andy crap.
If it makes you happy not being on my side, I'm happy for you. Seriously, I am. I'm just struggling trying to remember asking you to be on my side. If you can point it out to me, I'll be very grateful.Skashion said:I'm most definitely not on your side and to be honest the amount of end of shite here is fucking purile. Declaring you won an argument, especially in such an unintelligent way does no such thing.jimharri said:Something our resident hammers devotee seems to be overlooking. Carroll can whinge all he likes about it being a disgrace; he's guilty. Serious question to Mark; is there a discipline problem at the club (talking about on-field here). Three stupid red cards in, what, a couple of months?Skashion said:Contact is not proof of intent. Intent is the offence.
You quoted me as if I was agreeing with you. I wasn't. Not that hard to work out.jimharri said:If it makes you happy not being on my side, I'm happy for you. Seriously, I am. I'm just struggling trying to remember asking you to be on my side. If you can point it out to me, I'll be very grateful.
Fair enough; my humble apologies for that. It was never my intention to twist/subvert what you said. I did not even mean to quote you originally, but it's done now. Once again, apologies. I still hold my original opinion that Carroll was deserving of the red card. But I'm more than happy to clarify to anyone else on here that Skashion does NOT share that belief.Skashion said:You quoted me as if I was agreeing with you. I wasn't. Not that hard to work out.jimharri said:If it makes you happy not being on my side, I'm happy for you. Seriously, I am. I'm just struggling trying to remember asking you to be on my side. If you can point it out to me, I'll be very grateful.
Nay worries Jim. I think it was a typical FArce decision but I don't want to be getting into spats with fellow blues over Andy Carroll. Although I want West Ham to stay up as we have a mutual respect thing going on and also I've got a bet on with my dad that West Ham are staying up.jimharri said:Fair enough; my humble apologies for that. It was never my intention to twist/subvert what you said. I did not even mean to quote you originally, but it's done now. Once again, apologies. I still hold my original opinion that Carroll was deserving of the red card. But I'm more than happy to clarify to anyone else on here that Skashion does NOT share that belief.Skashion said:You quoted me as if I was agreeing with you. I wasn't. Not that hard to work out.jimharri said:If it makes you happy not being on my side, I'm happy for you. Seriously, I am. I'm just struggling trying to remember asking you to be on my side. If you can point it out to me, I'll be very grateful.