CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

I don't understand why Der Spiegel didn't provide all the e-mails to UEFA during the investigation. It seems pointless to publish new ones now.
 
Cityfan1977 said:
The problem is the smear campaign is working .
Click to expand...

Why is it? We are still in the Champions League and it does not seem to be affecting our sponsorship deals, or limit high profile establishments wanting to invest in us.

Who really gives a fuck what a few Irish dippers or jornalists from decaying rags think?
 
Nightmare Walking said:
Why is it? We are still in the Champions League and it does not seem to be affecting our sponsorship deals, or limit high profile establishments wanting to invest in us.

Who really gives a fuck what a few Irish dippers or jornalists from decaying rags think?
Click to expand...
Agreed
As much as its annoying and tedious to the fans it doesn't seem to be impacting investment in the club.
Saying that I would prefer a more deliberate legal response to the usual suspects
 
CC1 said:
Irony is that it’s the main perpetrators in G14 who win their league every year; are in debt yet are still splashing the cash.
Click to expand...

Hence Martin Samuel in the Mail.......

If a club can only spend what it generates then Manchester United and Liverpool, Real Madrid and Barcelona, Bayern Munich and Juventus will always have the most money in their domestic leagues. Here’s Bayern chairman Karl-Heinz Rummenigge on the future. ‘When we passed FFP 10 years ago, it was said you must not spend more money than you earn, this must again become the starting point.’

To the fuckwits and those that choose not to see, that makes perfect sense, spend more than you earn leads to debt, it's easily understandable family economics.

But if a business wants to grow, it must speculate to accumulate, but the cartel has declared that verboten.

If FFP was fit for purpose. it would concentrate almost entirely on debt, allowing owners to speculate if they want, with some caveats to prevent the likes of Jeff Bezos blowing everyone and everybody out the water, but with the primary purpose of preventing owners dumping the cost of their speculative spending on to their clubs.

The message to owners should be, spend if you want, but at your risk, it's on your tab not the club's
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CC1
Morning all, just did a quick circuit of the papers and none have picked up the Guardians latest piece of shit from Der Nazi. The tossers at Nazi have basically been made to look cuunts, they had the mother load that turned into a damp squib. The world moves on, fuck off Nazi.
 
Der Spiegel are being used as a puppet yet again. The "show" drops in performance and then up it pops again. Do any of you journos out there know anyone in or have contacts with the German media? Perhaps it's time for BM to do some investigation of its own.
 
The perfect fumble said:
Hence Martin Samuel in the Mail.......

If a club can only spend what it generates then Manchester United and Liverpool, Real Madrid and Barcelona, Bayern Munich and Juventus will always have the most money in their domestic leagues. Here’s Bayern chairman Karl-Heinz Rummenigge on the future. ‘When we passed FFP 10 years ago, it was said you must not spend more money than you earn, this must again become the starting point.’

To the fuckwits and those that choose not to see, that makes perfect sense, spend more than you earn leads to debt, it's easily understandable family economics.

But if a business wants to grow, it must speculate to accumulate, but the cartel has declared that verboten.
Click to expand...

These clubs are also used as cash cows for the owners. More competition means they have to spend more, meaning less $ for them. They want a closed shop where they decide who can and can't, vetting the new PL guy was scandalous and just goes to show who is really ruuning this leauge!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
doobyedoobye said:
Agreed
As much as its annoying and tedious to the fans it doesn't seem to be impacting investment in the club.
Saying that I would prefer a more deliberate legal response to the usual suspects
Click to expand...

well that’s because the sheik pays all the sponsorship, lies about attendances, have you not learnt anything from Der Spiegel ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.